Αγορά Πολιτών

Τρόπος Συμμετοχής


Πολίτες στην Αγορά

Έχουμε 244 επισκέπτες συνδεδεμένους


Location: Berlin, Germany

Only send SMS +41762833777

Citizen Band Radio:

- Call-channel: 1 FM (frequency modulation)

- Call-sign: EB-1142

Καρακουζίδης Παναγιώτης


Push-Button People


Η Εστία Μου




Framing Dissidents


Legal Notice 166


Message to the Bundeswehr


German Government 07/11/2020


CIA's Child Sex Slaves


Πατριώτη S.O.S.


Greek Dissidents Political Persecution


A Greek Government In Exile


60+ Trillion Euros Dispute for Greece's Minerals


21/06/2020 International Protests


Robbed at Copenhagen


George Bobolas


Prespes-Agreement Superimposed-Reality Ruthless-Propaganda





Mielke - Chrisochoidis


O/L to British P/M


O/L to E. Macron


Accountability-Free Genocides


Militarized "psychiatry"


The Absolute Evil


Gang-stalking Greeks


Byzantine Atrocities


European Dissidents ALARM


Human Rights' Court


The used up men


Dissidents - USG RICO crimes


Open Letter to Theresa May


Open Letter to António Guterres UN's SG


Triangulation - Zersetzen


Open Letter to Andrew Parker, MI5


Πράξεις ποταπές - Despicable choices



My father's death


Cavitation damage


Burglary and vandalism


Dry mini submarine


Message to Bundeswehr 2


Message to Bundeswehr 1


“Tough” guys and TOUGH guys


Μοναδική λύση, το Χόλιγουντ




Zeppelin: Beyond Gravity


Foreign intervention in Greece?


Η ανελεύθερη Ελλάδα


Η Ελλάδα καταγώγιο;


Αν.Επ. Π. Παυλόπουλο


Intangible prisons


Plausible deniability


Images of German w & s


Crimes against Humanity


"Chimera" - "Bellerophon"


pr. Donald Trump



Legal Notice 87


Βδέλλες, αποικιοκρατικές


Being a German


Legal Notice 84


Dirty colonial methods


Georgi Markov, BG - KGB


Samples of Barbarity


Ελλάδα - αποκόλληση


Έλληνες, στο έλεος...


Harvester's log 16/3/17



Legal Notice 66




Legal Notice 62



My story






Η Εστία μου



Why so untidy?






Εξόντωση Ελλήνων αντιφρονούντων;



Ζήτημα εμπιστοσύνης






Ανοικτή Επιστολή πρέσβη ΗΠΑ

Αφορμή, U2RIT vs Ελλάδα;


A request to U2RIT

Colonial aggression - 2

Open Letter to UN S.G.

Open Letter to p.C. & p. O.

Δήλωση πρόθεσης επαναπατρισμού


Ο "εφιάλτης" της Νυρεμβέργης

Συλλογή Φωτογραφιών

Αίτημα προστασίας, προς Ιταλία

Chroma key, background removal

Science and Ethics

Να συμβάλει και η U2RIT

Θα ξαναφτιάξουν πολλές φορές Άουσβιτς και Zyclon B


Split-Screen effect

Η Ζωή είναι Ωραία.

Βόρεια Κορέα

Λευτεριά στους Έλληνες, εξανα- γκαστικά "Εξαφανισμένους"


Μυστικές δίκες;


Πολιτισμό, ή, απληστία;

Ακραία Στυγνότητα

Η Τέχνη της Επιβίωσης

Political Asylum 3

Επιστροφή στις ρίζες

The Human Cost of Torture

An urgent appeal for solidarity

More obvious than the Sun

Western "culture"

Political Asylum

Έννομη Προστασία

Μια μήνυση που εγείρει ερωτηματικά




Honor your father...


Creative Greeks

A pair of Dictatorships

Plausibly Deniable Political Persecution Scheme PDF Εκτύπωση E-mail
Αξιολόγηση Χρήστη: / 0
Συνεννόηση για Δράση - Απόψεις
Συντάχθηκε απο τον/την Χρήστος Μπούμπουλης (Christos Boumpoulis)   
Τρίτη, 28 Απρίλιος 2020 11:51
Edward Snowden on the most shocking way the NSA spies on people 2014
Azk IV - "Mind Control" - Dr. Rauni Kilde
Dr  Rauni Kilde on chips in Mind Control
Soulless Beings of the Matrix - AI Consciousness - Organic Portals by Flat Earth Paradise
Plausibly Deniable Political Persecution Scheme
Here are the facts:

Protecting The Truth Tellers—Presenting The One Free Press Coalition’s Second Monthly 10 Most Urgent List Of Endangered Journalists
Press freedom is under attack globally, with an appalling rise in harassment and violence against journalists whose only offense is trying to report and share the truth. That’s why Forbes announced in March the launch of the One Free Press Coalition, a collective effort of news outlets worldwide using our reach (a billion strong) to spotlight and be a voice on behalf of the journalists who are under attack for reporting the truth.
Persistent aggression against those who pursue the truth demands our continued attention. To that end the Coalition’s 11 existing media members (AP, De Standaard, EURACTIV, Financial Times, Forbes, HuffPost, Le Temps, Reuters, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Time, Yahoo News) are pleased to welcome six additional organizations to the cause this month: The Boston Globe and Fortune in the U.S. as well as European counterparts CNN Money Switzerland, Corriere Della Sera, Deutsche Welle and Republik. We’re heralding the new month with a new list of 10 Most Urgent cases (in no specific order), presenting a mix of new names and some which appeared last month but remain a top priority for those of us with the freedom to be a voice for the silenced.
“Ten Most Urgent” List, April 2019
1. Miroslava Breach Velducea (Mexico)
Murdered for reporting on corruption and politics.
2. Maria Ressa and Rappler (The Philippines)
Arrest and legal threats for critical media outlet and its editor.
3. Tran Thi Nga (Vietnam)
Journalist accused of spreading propaganda.
4. Azimjon Askarov (Kyrgyzstan)
A life sentence for documenting human rights abuses.
5. Rana Ayyub (India)
When reporting leads to escalating online threats.
6. Miguel Mora and Lucía Pineda Ubau (Nicaragua)
Nicaraguan journalists detained amid media crackdown.
7. Anna Nimiriano (South Sudan)
Newspaper editor in South Sudan, lives under constant threat.
8. Amade Abubacar (Mozambique)
Mozambican journalist held in detention without trial.
9. Claudia Duque (Colombia)
Human rights defender endures attacks in Colombia where impunity remains 98.81%. The veteran investigative reporter has endured kidnapping, illegal surveillance, psychological torture, and exile.
10. Osman Mirghani (Sudan)
Independent journalist detained, health deteriorating.
Germany’s sovereignty restricted by US and allies, insider’s book claims
In Gerd-Helmut Komossa’s book “The German Card”, he claims Germany has, until now, been controlled by the United States and its allies, and was even viewed as a possible target.
“At a NATO meeting, I realized that a possible plan was for the alliance to hit the largest dam in West Germany with a nuclear bomb. If strikes had taken place, a great number of civilians would have died,” Gerd-Helmut Komossa says in his “The German Card” book.
The German Card
The state treaty, dated May 21, 1949 and classified by BND as top secret, suggests restrictions of state sovereignty of the Federal Republic of Germany, introduced for a period until 2099. These restrictions include the provision that the winning coalition exercise complete control over Germany’s mass media and communications.
The whole spectrum of German political parties is supervised by a special Washington-based controlling body, while local US-licensed media serve as a more sophisticated means of brainwashing than the Nazi propagandist machine. Meanwhile, Germany’s territory is still occupied by US troops.
Though most of the German officers were not originally inclined against America, a lot of them being educated in the United States, they are now experiencing disappointment and even disgust with Washington’s policies. These officers realize that the hegemonistic policy is destined for destruction of socioeconomic systems of particular nations and whole regions, while the so-called order Washington is trying to impose is just a synonym for chaos.
The Modern COINTELPRO and How To Fight It
Crowdsourcing Repression
by Max Wilbert / June 7th, 2014
Let’s Be Honest
Despite the seeming popularity of environmental and social justice work in the modern world, we’re not winning. We’re losing. In fact, we’re losing really badly.
State Tactic #1: Overt Repression
Fighting back – indeed, any real resistance – is sacrilegious to those in power. Their response is often straightforward: a dozen cops slam you to the ground and cuff you; “less-lethal” weapons cover the advance of a line of riot police; the sharp report of SWAT team’s bullets.
State Tactic #2: Covert Repression
Violent repression is glaring. It gets covered in the news, and you can see it on the streets. But other times, repression isn’t so obvious. A recent leaked document from the private security and corporate intelligence firm Strategic Forecasting, Inc. (better known as STRATFOR) contained this illustrative statement:
Most authorities will tolerate a certain amount of activism because it is seen as a way to let off steam. They appease the protesters by letting them think that they are making a difference — as long as the protesters do not pose a threat. But as protest movements grow, authorities will act more aggressively to neutralize the organizers.
Harassment (subpoenas, false accusations, discriminatory enforcement of taxation, etc.)
Psychological warfare
The JTRIG Leaks
On February 24 of this year, Glenn Greenwald released an article detailing a secret National Security Agency (NSA) unit called JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group). The article, which sheds new light on the tactics used to suppress social movements and threats to power, is worth quoting at length:
Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums.
Here is one illustrative list of tactics from the JTRIG leaks.
Discredit a target
- Setup a honey-trap
- Change their photos on social networking sites
- Write a blog purporting to be one of their victims (e.g. www.bobolasgate.info - C.B.)
- Email/text their colleagues, neighbours, friends, etc.
“Crowdsourced Repression”
The campaigns against DGR do have many of the hallmarks of COINTELPRO-style repression. They are built on a foundation of political differences magnified into divisive hatred through paranoia and the spread of hearsay. In the 1960s and 70s, techniques that seem similar were used to create divisions within groups like the Black Panthers and the American Indian Movement.
Divide and Conquer
By itself, verifying rumors before spreading them is a poor defense against the repression modern activists face. Instead, we must challenge divisiveness itself: one of the biggest threats to our success.
The 2011 STRATFOR leak included information about corporate strategies to neutralize activist and community movements. Essentially, STRATFOR advocates dividing movements into four character types: radicals, idealists, realists, and opportunists. These camps can then be dealt with summarily:
First, isolate the radicals. Second, “cultivate” the idealists and “educate” them into becoming realists. And finally, co-opt the realists into agreeing with industry.
This is how movements are neutralized: those who should be allies are divided, infighting becomes rampant, and paranoia rules the roost. To combat these strategies, we must understand the danger they represent and how to counter them.
Even Though Lincoln advised us that new thinking is an imperative when making revolutionary changes in a country that seems to be out of control, the ability to do so is often laden heavy with obstacles and problems because there are people who absolutely do not what your message to be heard. They are paid great sums of money to impart information that benefits the global order and pushes the continued agenda of unparalleled corruption that we hear about every day.
We read about it on the internet, we trust independent journalists to inform us, and yet the mainstream avoids adding any kind of organized retort to the general operations of government.
It is this policy of imparting dishonest propaganda that thwarts liberty and even taints the very purpose of our right to free speech and free press.
For many years we have known that not only does the NSA and other alphabet agencies spy on our internet conversations, they also move our conversations in a subtle way. It was confirmed in recent years that the U.S. Military has been manipulating social media by using fake identities to influence conversations and spread pro-American propaganda. It’s called “Online Persona Management Services.” Under the Centcom contract, it allows the creation of up to 10 fake online personas, known as “sock puppets,” for every service man or woman working on the program.”
Sock puppets as the military calls them have been called trolls in social media. A troll simply sets up a fake Facebook account, makes up a name, puts up a few pictures to make it look as though they are legitimate participators is social media.
They are more than likely special psy-ops agents who are there to discredit anyone who post what can be determine to be an anti-government slogan or an anti war statement.
Its purpose is to control free speech according to an article that appeared in the Guardian titled Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media: “The project has been likened by web experts to China’s attempts to control and restrict free speech on the internet. Critics are likely to complain that it will allow the US military to create a false consensus in online conversations, crowd out unwelcome opinions and smother commentaries or reports that do not correspond with its own objectives.”
According to Centcom, their only objective is to counter extremists and enemy propaganda outside of the U.S., saying that it would be unlawful to address U.S. audiences.
The Pentagon already spends four billion dollars per year to influence public opinion, and the DOD spends hundreds of millions on information campaigns in countless countries occupied by the U.S. military.
But, perhaps even more disturbing than all of this is fact that the CIA has infiltrated the biggest press institutions since the early 1950s. One has to look no further than Operation Mockingbird – a secret CIA campaign to spread disinformation and false stories to foreign governments during the cold war. The CIA did this by manipulating the media into focusing on propaganda, sabotage, and subversion.
It was later revealed in Congressional hearings consisted of literally paying off editors and reporters and most mainstream news outlets: the New York Times, CBS, Washington Post, Newsweek, AP, Reuters, and countless others.
That is not all, you can go back to 2003 and dig up the fact that the Pentagon’s strategies of Psy Ops were transitioning to an “Info war Operations Roadmap” to “dominate” the electronic media spheres, and soon thereafter we learned the Bush Administration invested 1.6 billion into fake news and targeted psychological warfare broadcasts to synthesize Washington’s propaganda line for both domestic and foreign audiences.
These strategies were put into place immediately after the attacks of 9/11. The citizens of the United States including members of the foreign press agencies have always been the target of advanced psychological warfare and disinformation, much of it going unquestioned into the grand narrative.
“U.S defense, Intel and homeland security officials are constructing a parallel world. Where the majority of sheep can be swayed into the coercion of giving up their sovereignty for the plans and visions of the elite Globalist order.”
There are others that see the world differently and attempt to describe the mounting evidence of despotism without facing dire consequences.
The technocracy has provided for everyone a fountain of information that is intentionally given for an action and a solution.
Information on leaks, whistleblowers, false flags, all are controlled in order to little by little spark civil upheaval, reveal who we consider enemies or undesirables, changes in civil liberties, and provide misdirection.
Keeping us under the gun with the Jade Helm 15 exercises and the psy-op that ISIS is just over the border or are here among us and the constant goading of Islam by Muslim haters is enough to keep the monkeys occupied with worry and cognitive dissonance.
Dr. Thorsten Quandt, * 1971, is a Professor of Communication Studies at the University of Münster. He was holding the Chair of Online Communication and Interactive Media at the University of Hohenheim from 2009-2012, where he also served as the Director of the Institute of Communication Studies in 2012.
Source: https://www.uni-muenster.de/Kowi/en/personen/thorsten-quandt.html
Thorsten Quandt University of Münster 200 PUBLICATIONS 3,757 CITATIONS
Lena Frischlich University of Münste 72 PUBLICATIONS 364 CITATIONS
Svenja Boberg University of Münster 16 PUBLICATIONS 40 CITATIONS
Tim Schatto-Eckrodt University of Münster 13 PUBLICATIONS 25 CITATIONS
Democratic Resilience in Times of
Online Propaganda, Fake News, Fear and Hate Speech
The digital society offers new possibilities for democratic participation as well as for disseminating manipulative content. Strategic agents are abusing the easy access to digitally generated publics to spread online propaganda, fake news, fear and hate speech. Such manipulative online content has been assumed to play a crucial role in radicalizing individuals, fostering social polarization, and weakening democracy per se. Even if the empirical evidence partly contradicts such dramatic expectations, the consequences of manipulative online communication should not be underestimated. In consequence, in order to support media recipients in dealing with manipulation attempts via online-media, it is necessary to promote users digital democratic resilience, their individual resistance against manipulative attempts and their ability to make autonomous decisions in virtual communication spheres. However, in order to implement effective tools empowering users and promoting digital democratic resilience, an in-depth understanding of the actors, target groups and impacts of the aforementioned phenomena is needed.
Funding and Associated Research Departments
This junior research group is supported by the Digital Society research program funded by the Ministry of Culture and Science of the German State of North Rhine-Westphalia.
The group is associated with the Department of Communication and the Department of Information Systems of the University of Münster, Germany. In addition, the junior research group is an associate partner of the PropStop project on identification, detection, and combating covert propaganda attacks via online-media.
About PropStop
PropStop is a project funded by the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) that aims at studying hidden propaganda disseminations via online media, in order to identify and prove accordant attempts.
Pandemic Populism: Facebook pages of alternative news media and the Corona crisis - a computational content analysis
As noted in the introductory section, alternative news media were suspected of being problematic, confusing, and misleading voices in the Corona crisis by politicians, journalists, and the public alike. Some politicians, even in liberal democracies, called for legal action to prevent the public from being dangerously misinformed by channels that propagate rumors or lies, which in turn, were feared to fuel the (self)harm of citizens, and indeed, some countries imposed stricter rules and regulations based on these assumptions.
The current analysis of the Facebook activities of German language alternative news media, covering the beginning of January until mid-March, paints a more nuanced picture of the situation. Our analysis does not reveal a notable amount of “fake news” (as identified by fact checkers) in these channels. In that sense, alternative news media were not a major force spreading outright lies or fabrications during that time, and they were not openly conspicuous. Given other research and theorizing on fake news and disinformation (Quandt et al., 2019), this is not surprising; the best propaganda is disguised (Jowett and O’Donnell, 2012) and the best lie always has a true core.
Alternative news media outlets like those studied here have been found to embed their ideologically-biased content subtly into an overall seemingly innocuous communication strategy (Frischlich et al., 2020). Broad and open disinformation strategies would not fit the way these alternative news media sites operate. These outlets are, instead, characterized by commenting and criticizing the orthodox, majority perspective, while at the same time depending on the more traditional mainstream media as a necessary counterpart (Figenschou and Ihlebæk, 2019). In some ways, alternative news media function much like a photo negative of what and how the large mainstream media reports on; the outlines are the same, but they are mirrored with reversed colors.
Our findings show that the alternative news media remain true to their principles during the examined stage of the Corona crisis. The large majority of posts mirrored traditional mainstream media reports in terms of their topical structure and the actors involved. We did not see a completely fabricated reality here. However, as expected, we did see a certain populist spin in their posts (de Vreese et al., 2018), that is, an anti-establishment tone, critical of public institutions and political actions of the administration, evoking strong emotions. So, while the topics did mirror the mainstream, the tone of the posts did not. The coverage was biased toward focusing on criticism regarding the communication and management of politicians and mainstream media, often by changing the framing of the news to fit their generally “anti-establishment” perspective. As such, the alternative news media examined here used COVID-19 - related information to foster their long-term narratives, namely a critical stance toward established politicians (Frischlich et al., 2020), refugees and immigration (Heft et al., 2019) or, more recently, a tendency towards climate change conspiracies (Douglas and Sutton, 2015). In that sense, the Corona crisis does not change the general logic of German alternative news media’s coverage, but it shows how world events are adjusted and assimilated to their respective ideology.
Nevertheless, our data also shows that alternative news media did prominently feature rumors and conspiracy theories regarding COVID-19 and the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and created a notable amount of interactions with this kind of content. Again, these stories were strongly linked to alternative news media’s general worldview and pre-existing narratives, like a strong opposition to climate activism (as visible in the claim that the Corona crisis is just following the patterns of panic mongering introduced by climate activists), anti-vaccination attitudes (manifesting in the allegation that Bill Gates brought the virus into circulation to make money on the vaccine), or disapproval of foreigners (with the respective conspiracy theory that the Chinese developed the virus as a weapon and spread it via tourists and immigrants
to destroy the West). In essence, our analysis revealed alternative news media to indeed report on the crisis in the form of pandemic populism, following a specific and expected communication style (de Vreese et al., 2018), but did not simply spread open lies.
It is noteworthy that this information mix is much more likely to contribute to the feared “infodemic” (WHO, 2020a) as media users are usually better in noting highly non-credible sources and disinformation bits (Pennycook et al., 2018; Pennycook and Rand, 2019). The observed recontextualization of information, plausibly with the goal of undermining trust in public statements and policies (EEAS, 2020b), and the adaption of events in alternative news media’s general, anti-systemic meta-narrative, is likely to sow uncertainty and confusion. And uncertainty can, in turn, benefit authoritarian worldviews (Duckitt and Fisher, 2003) and even extremist positions (Rieger et al., 2017).
Further, the larger impact of alternative news media is likely to be indirect. As the data analysis shows, direct interactions on the basis of alternative news media is high, and we found several cases where their coverage was shared and picked up elsewhere, for example, on conspiracy theorists’ Youtube channels, which serve as a secondary distribution and amplification system. Here, the messages of alternative news media are referenced as sources and critical voices that speak the truth (in contrast to professionalized mainstream media).
Our analysis has notable limitations, though, that need to be considered. First, we focused on a single, specific country (Germany), a relatively short time frame (initial phase of spreading and first pandemic phase), and examined only the Facebook activities of the most relevant alternative news media within the country. A subsequent analysis will shed some light on the parallel Facebook activities of mainstream media (in an upcoming working paper of the authors).
Naturally, comparative data from other countries, further social media channels, and a longer time period, might be helpful in verifying what we deduced as more general principles from the given case, and in particular, the information strategies of alternative news media in the Corona crisis.
As it is, this initial analysis of Facebook posts covering the crisis does not support some of the public fears about a widespread dissemination of completely fabricated news through the alternative news media. Nevertheless, alternative news media contribute to public confusion by their specific framing strategies and by constructing a contradictory, menacing, and distrusting worldview, which calls any official statement into question. This may be dysfunctional for social coherence in an unprecedented time of crisis; still, such communication largely operates within the given limits of discourse in a liberal democracy. Moreover, studies on the association between the consumption of alternative news media and risky behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic are missing so far. Thus, while we know more about the content through the present study, the actual effects on the users are just (plausible) conjectures.
Some of the more radical political demands of limiting or censoring such debates seem to be unwarranted on the basis of our preliminary analysis; it is even likely that such legal action may indeed be counterproductive because it would further feed anti-systemic sentiments, potentially without having the intended short-term effects. It may also be argued that especially in times of crisis, the strength of a democracy is first and foremost reflected in its open and plural debates, even if some of it is not particularly helpful or even hostile, as documented in our preliminary analysis of alternative
news media’s coverage during the Corona crisis.
'Pandemic populism': Germany sees rise in conspiracy theories
Right-wing activists in particular are trying to stir up hatred against politicians and the democratic system, a new study warns.
"We found several cases where their statements were picked up by others, for example on the YouTube channels of conspiracy theorists, which serve as a secondary distribution system. They label alternative news media messages as credible," Quandt says.
Deliberately destructive posts
Simone Rafael from the Amadeu Antonio Foundation, which works to strengthen democratic civic society, notes that these outlets have a clear goal with their reporting.
"According to their own statements, 'alternative media' believe they are in an 'info-war' against democratic political parties and against parliamentary democracy. They spread uncertainty in order to overthrow the system," says Rafael.
Threat of violence
How dangerous are conspiracy theories for society? In the University of Münster study, researchers concluded that the spread of conspiracy theories poses a real threat.
"Alternative media can contribute to public confusion by constructing a contradictory, threatening and suspicious world view that questions every 'official' statement," communication scientist Thorsten Quandt writes in the study.
Experts have observed, with concern, that conspiracy theories are an important building block in the world view of violent right-wing criminals.
"Especially among conspiracy theory supporters, we encounter a closed-off world view with a great desire to act. They see themselves as the only people who can stop the downfall," warns Rafael of the Amadeu Antonio Foundation.
The longer the coronavirus pandemic holds society in its grip, the more conspiracy theorists could become radicalized. Petra Pau, the vice president of the German parliament and a Left party lawmaker, shares this concern.
For her, the problem is not a virtual one, but rather a very real one. "Local politicians have been exposed in recent years to right-wing threats in particular. I see the potential for danger if local authorities are put under pressure from the coronavirus and cut certain services, that people will then look for culprits. The agitators could use that," Pau says.
The murder of center-right Christian Democrat regional politician Walter Lübcke last year shows how the danger needs to be taken seriously. A right-wing extremist shot him in 2019. The motive? Hatred for his pro-refugee policies.
Ο Πέτρος Γέμτος γεννήθηκε στη Λάρισα το 1939. Σπούδασε νομικά, οικονομικά, κοινωνιολογία και φιλοσοφία στα πανεπιστήμια Αθηνών και Tubingen της Γερμανίας. Είναι ομότιμος καθηγητής του Πανεπιστημίου Αθηνών, τ. Πρύτανης. Είναι διδάκτωρ της Νομικής και της Οικονομικής του Πανεπιστημίου Tubingen, υφηγητής της επιστημολογίας της Οικονομικής του Πανεπιστημίου Αθηνών. Τακτικός καθηγητής Πολιτικής Οικονομίας της Νομικής Σχολής του Πανεπιστημίου Αθηνών και τακτικός καθηγητής της φιλοσοφίας και ιστορίας των κοινωνικών επιστημών του Τμήματος Μεθοδολογίας, Ιστορίας και Θεωρίας της Επιστήμης του Πανεπιστημίου Αθηνών. Διετέλεσε Πρύτανης του Πανεπιστημίου Αθηνών, Πρόεδρος του Πανεπιστημίου Θεσσαλίας, Γενικός Γραμματέας του Υπουργείου Παιδείας. Υπήρξε Πρόεδρος και ενεργό μέλος πολλών εθνικών και διεθνών εκπαιδευτικών και ερευνητικών οργανισμών και επιτροπών. Είναι συγγραφέας 13 βιβλίων και 200 περίπου άρθρων σε συλλογικούς τόμους και έγκυρα επιστημονικά περιοδικά, που καλύπτουν τους τομείς του Δικαίου, της Οικονομικής, της φιλοσοφίας και μεθοδολογίας των κοινωνικών επιστημών, των διεθνών σχέσεων, της θεωρίας των θεσμών. Ιδιαίτερο βάρος έχει στο έργο του η μελέτη της διεπιστημονικής συνεργασίας Οικονομικής και Νομικής που οδήγησε στην πρώτη εμφάνιση της Οικονομικής Ανάλυσης του Δικαίου στη χώρα μας.
Source: http://www.biblionet.gr/author/24700/Πέτρος_Α._Γέμτος
Ελευθερία της βούλησης και κοινωνικές επιστήμες
Η δημιουργία θεσμών (αυτοφυών ή με συλλογική απόφαση) ως μέσα επίλυσης κοινωνικών προβλημάτων για ένα ον που επιδιώκει με μεγάλους βαθμούς βουλητικής ελευθερίας ικανοποίηση του ίδιου συμφέροντος (και συνεπώς επιδιώκει να εκμεταλλευθεί τη συνεργασιακή στάση του άλλου), ενώ έχει περιορισμένες δυνατότητες επεξεργασίας πληροφοριακών δεδομένων, οδηγεί στη διαμόρφωση μέσω των επαπειλοόμενων κυρώσεων σταθερών προσδοκιών που διευκολύνουν τις συναλλαγές και αυξάνουν την ανθρώπινη ευημερία.
Μηχανισμοί και θεσμοί κοινωνικού ελέγχου που μέσω τυπικών ή άτυπων κυρώσεων αποσκοπούν στην εμφάνιση αυξητικής της ευημερίας κοινωνικής συμπεριφοράς είναι προφανώς ανενεργοί και χωρίς νόημα, αν οι ανθρώπινες πράξεις είναι φυσικά (από διεργασίες του εγκεφάλου) ή κοινωνικά (μέσω ακραίας κοινωνικοποίησης) προκαθορισμένες. Την ανάλυση κόστους-ωφελειών που βρίσκεται στη βάση κάθε ορθολογικής επιλογής μεταξύ εναλλακτικών δυνατοτήτων αύξησης της ευημερίας μπορεί να επιτελέσει μόνο ο άνθρωπος ως φορέας περιορισμένων ενστικτωδών μηχανισμών κα ανεξειδίκευτου βιοτικού χώρου (αντίθετα με τα άλλα ζώα μπορεί να ζήσει και στον πόλο και στον Ισημερινό). Καθολικός βιολογικός ντετερμινισμός σημαίνει, ουσιαστικά, κατάργηση των κοινωνικών επιστημών και αντικατάστασή τους με βιοχημικές έρευνες του εγκεφάλου.
Source: Γέμτος (2010). Ελευθερία της βούλησης και κοινωνικές επιστήμες. Επιστήμη και Κοινωνία: Επιθεώρηση Πολιτικής και Ηθικής Θεωρίας, 25, 125-133. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283671189_Eleutheria_tes_bouleses_kai_koinonikes_epistemes
By this present article I wish to argue that, the rest of the European States should, as soon as possible, relief Germany from all the existing World War II de jure and de facto burdens otherwise, the entire European Continent does not have a future, whatever this might mean.
During my formal studies at the Kapodistrian University of Athens I had the honour to be one of Professor's Petros A. Gemtos students, which I consider him as being one of the greatest contemporary Greek scientists.
Prof. Gemtos taught me about the essence and the inherent limitations of the so-called “social sciences”.
Accordingly, the society, fundamentally, remains a continuously evolving and self-referential, dynamic system the structure and the dynamics of which, continuously interacts with our expressed comprehension about them (e.g. self-fulfilling prophecies, etc.). As such, our references to any partial phenomena, like the Alternative News Media, can be meaningful and honest only if we specifically associate them with their corresponding context, meaning in terms of Cybernetics, with their corresponding meta-system.
Regarding the study titled “Pandemic Populism: Facebook pages of alternative news media and the Corona crisis - a computational content analysis” which was conducted by the, Thorsten Quandt, Lena Frischlich, Svenja Boberg, and Tim Schatto-Eckrodt, of the University of Münster seem to having severely violated crucial methodological rules.
More specifically,
- their Alternative New Media’s definition does not makes references, to the contemporary European political conditions mostly relating to European Continent’s settler-colonization by the U2RIT; the massive, involuntary trans-humanization of European citizens with brain-locking, remote neural monitoring electronic technology; to the political consequences of the existing May 21th, 1949 treaty, meaning the complete control by the U2RIT of the Germany’s telecommunications, media, education, etc.; to the existence within Europe of dictatorial regimes (e.g. Greece, etc.); to the dominant character of methods of political control, within Europe, like the death-program gang-stalking; to the overt inability and/or unwillingness of the European, governments, security-authorities and armed-forces, to terminate the European citizens’ human-rights, massive and severe, violations. This absence of vital references makes, most of the qualitative issues, with regard to the Alternative News Media, to be undecidable (in terms of Cybernetics).
- The study makes no reference at all to the intertwined issue of the contemporary human beings’ freedom of will (brain-implants, “Monarch”-programming, MKUltra chemicals, etc.).
- The study poses four (actually five) research questions which they are all quantitative. However, at the conclusion of the study the researchers draw qualitative conclusion in the domain of the Alternative-News-Media perceived teleology, thus, given the absence of a sufficient reference to the context, making their study incoherent.
- The study does not discriminate between, conspiracy-theorists and conspiracy-analysts.
- The study does not discriminate between, conspiracy-theorists and eyewitnesses of contemporary settler-colonizing atrocities.
- The study does not make any reference to the existing unconventional weapons of mass destruction, meaning the mind-control weapons, biological/chemical/directed-energy, etc.
- The study does not make any reference to the consequences of the coexistence with the natural citizens, within a society, of “organic portals”.
- The study does not discriminate between, authentic Alternative News Media and U.S. licensed_and_financed “Mockingbird” “Alternative News Media”.
- The study does not mention that it was financed by the German government and if some of its authors are, potentially, linked with the Bundeswehr.
The above mentioned study was swiftly propagated to the German Media by such an way that it appears to denounce a part, if not totally, the existing Alternative News Media, in such a degree that, potentially, it might result the unjust and illegal “targeting” for either legal and/or political persecution, of these Alternative News Media.
According to Prof. Gemtos, at the above mentioned article, social order is achievable through the prompt establishment of genuine and effective social institutions. However, the remorseless, traditional, professional and serial U2RIT’s practice to perpetrate genocidal policies against “targeted” indigenous populations has, apparently, infiltrated most of the International and European social institutions to a degree that they have become ineffective and unsuitable for the European citizens to resort to.
Many good people, members of the European natural leadership, like, Bernd Seiffert, Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, archib. Christodoulos, Giannos Kranidiotis, Tassos Papadopoulos, Neoklis Sarris, Sarantos Kargakos, Miltiadis Evert, Malvina Karali, singer Arleta, Kostas Tsalikidis, Panagiotis Kondylis, and many others, they have been already assassinated by the settler-colonizers. And the European citizens appear to be reluctant to rescue the very few left ones.
For the above reasons, I estimate that, sadly, the (plausibly deniable) assassination, perpetrated by the U2RIT, of what is leftover from the European natural leadership, most likely is imminent, with the European citizens being passively complicit to this atrocity.
Christos Boumpoulis
Τελευταία Ενημέρωση στις Τρίτη, 28 Απρίλιος 2020 23:31