Αγορά Πολιτών

Τρόπος Συμμετοχής


Πολίτες στην Αγορά

Έχουμε 2224 επισκέπτες συνδεδεμένους


Location: Berlin, Germany

Only send SMS +41762833777

Citizen Band Radio:

- Call-channel: 1 FM (frequency modulation)

- Call-sign: EB-1142

Καρακουζίδης Παναγιώτης


Push-Button People


Η Εστία Μου




Framing Dissidents


Legal Notice 166


Message to the Bundeswehr


German Government 07/11/2020


CIA's Child Sex Slaves


Πατριώτη S.O.S.


Greek Dissidents Political Persecution


A Greek Government In Exile


60+ Trillion Euros Dispute for Greece's Minerals


21/06/2020 International Protests


Robbed at Copenhagen


George Bobolas


Prespes-Agreement Superimposed-Reality Ruthless-Propaganda





Mielke - Chrisochoidis


O/L to British P/M


O/L to E. Macron


Accountability-Free Genocides


Militarized "psychiatry"


The Absolute Evil


Gang-stalking Greeks


Byzantine Atrocities


European Dissidents ALARM


Human Rights' Court


The used up men


Dissidents - USG RICO crimes


Open Letter to Theresa May


Open Letter to António Guterres UN's SG


Triangulation - Zersetzen


Open Letter to Andrew Parker, MI5


Πράξεις ποταπές - Despicable choices



My father's death


Cavitation damage


Burglary and vandalism


Dry mini submarine


Message to Bundeswehr 2


Message to Bundeswehr 1


“Tough” guys and TOUGH guys


Μοναδική λύση, το Χόλιγουντ




Zeppelin: Beyond Gravity


Foreign intervention in Greece?


Η ανελεύθερη Ελλάδα


Η Ελλάδα καταγώγιο;


Αν.Επ. Π. Παυλόπουλο


Intangible prisons


Plausible deniability


Images of German w & s


Crimes against Humanity


"Chimera" - "Bellerophon"


pr. Donald Trump



Legal Notice 87


Βδέλλες, αποικιοκρατικές


Being a German


Legal Notice 84


Dirty colonial methods


Georgi Markov, BG - KGB


Samples of Barbarity


Ελλάδα - αποκόλληση


Έλληνες, στο έλεος...


Harvester's log 16/3/17



Legal Notice 66




Legal Notice 62



My story






Η Εστία μου



Why so untidy?






Εξόντωση Ελλήνων αντιφρονούντων;



Ζήτημα εμπιστοσύνης






Ανοικτή Επιστολή πρέσβη ΗΠΑ

Αφορμή, U2RIT vs Ελλάδα;


A request to U2RIT

Colonial aggression - 2

Open Letter to UN S.G.

Open Letter to p.C. & p. O.

Δήλωση πρόθεσης επαναπατρισμού


Ο "εφιάλτης" της Νυρεμβέργης

Συλλογή Φωτογραφιών

Αίτημα προστασίας, προς Ιταλία

Chroma key, background removal

Science and Ethics

Να συμβάλει και η U2RIT

Θα ξαναφτιάξουν πολλές φορές Άουσβιτς και Zyclon B


Split-Screen effect

Η Ζωή είναι Ωραία.

Βόρεια Κορέα

Λευτεριά στους Έλληνες, εξανα- γκαστικά "Εξαφανισμένους"


Μυστικές δίκες;


Πολιτισμό, ή, απληστία;

Ακραία Στυγνότητα

Η Τέχνη της Επιβίωσης

Political Asylum 3

Επιστροφή στις ρίζες

The Human Cost of Torture

An urgent appeal for solidarity

More obvious than the Sun

Western "culture"

Political Asylum

Έννομη Προστασία

Μια μήνυση που εγείρει ερωτηματικά




Honor your father...


Creative Greeks

A pair of Dictatorships

John Bedini has died PDF Εκτύπωση E-mail
Αξιολόγηση Χρήστη: / 0
Συνεννόηση για Δράση - Απόψεις
Συντάχθηκε απο τον/την Χρήστος Μπούμπουλης (Christos Boumpoulis)   
Τετάρτη, 21 Οκτώβριος 2020 13:28

The REAL Rife Machine by John Bedini - Bedini RPX



2 ALTERNATIVE Energy & Medical Researchers have died, John and Gary Bedini



Bedini RPX Sideband Generator - How to set it up



Mad Max: Fury Road (2015) - Chase moves on (2/10) [4K]



John Bedini has died


To the best of my knowledge, there was no "foul play" associated with John's death. His brother Gary had been under-going treatments for throat cancer for the last two months, and John was quite stressed about that. He had done everything he knew how to do to help his brother get through this illness. By the time all of his treatments were done, Gary was cancer-free but quite weak. While still in the hospital, nursing staff helping him get out of bed to go to physical therapy dropped him by mistake. The fall broke his pelvis. At that point, Gary's condition went down hill very rapidly.
John and Gary had been brothers, best friends, and business partners for almost 40 years. Professionally, they had done everything together. When Gary died, I am quite sure that John was not expecting to die. All last week, John was working to help put Gary's personal affairs in order. John died 4 hours after Gary. I don't believe an autopsy was done, but if he died of a "broken heart" it wouldn't surprise me in the least.
Please DO NOT start any rumors about John's death being suspicious, because it was NOT. John's death was shocking, and unexpected, but there is absolutely no evidence that it was anything other than a natural death.

Source: https://www.overunity.com/16965/john-bedini-has-died/


When settler-colonialism is being perpetrated during a supposed peace-time, it relies on the principle of the “plausible deniability” and oppression.

Oppression aims towards maintaining collective fear.

The archaic fear of death rises collectively when epidemics of lethal diseases are being manifesting.

Therefore, during a supposed peace-time, the perpetrators of settler-colonialism they have corresponding motives, to covertly cause lethal (but controllable) epidemics (i.e. genocide) within a targeted population and, to exterminate each and every non-stupid member of this population.


I do not always curry in my hand an activated video recorder.

Consequently, I can prove less facts than those that I do know of.

Consequently, I can publicize less facts than those that I do know of.

However, I am in a position to, under a certain degree of statistical trust, estimate that, even if people, like myself, we succeed in making cancer (and aids, hepatitis, Alzheimer, cardiovascular diseases, ms, etc.) to vanish, due to effective medical-protocols, as far as the contemporary settler-colonialism persists, then, the global mortality due to (new) diseases shall probably remain, more or less, the same.

Concluding, it seems to me that, the combination of, peace, freedom, cooperation, and frugal prosperity, remains mutually excluding with the settler-colonialism.


Christos Boumpoulis



P.S.: It might not be a bad idea at all that, the non-stupid members of the targeted populations to be promptly rescued by the populations themselves.




Incompleteness and provability logic

December 14, 2017. Studying Gödel’s theorems in their original arithmetic context involves a lot of detail and hard work if all you are interested in is the logical content (e.g. Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems). I talk about an alternative called provability logic, which cleanly extracts all the interesting logical behaviour. In this context, Gödel’s results reduce to a single logical axiom called Löb’s Theorem and the existence of certain propositional fixed points.



Prerequisites: propositional logic, some exposure to modal logic.


Gödel’s famous First Incompleteness Theorem hinges on the fact that a sufficiently expressive formal system (like ordinary arithmetic) can be jerry-rigged to make statements which are true but not provable. The basic idea: give statements labels so you can refer to them, and a way of talking about provability. Then combine them to make a sentence which says


I am not provable.


More accurately, we would construct a sentence L (for “liar”) which says


Statement L is not provable.


If the formal system is consistent — it can’t prove false statements — then it cannot prove L, since if L was provable, the sentence would be false. This means L must be true! A formal system which cannot prove all the statements about it that are true is called incomplete. So, the First Incompleteness Theorem just states that consistent systems which can refer to themselves, and make statements about provability, must be incomplete.


The Second Incompleteness Theorem is a sort of converse. It turns out that if a system can prove it is consistent, then this must be false: the system will be inconsistent! So, there is a statement in the system which is false but provable, as opposed to true but unprovable. To move beyond these high-concept summaries, usually one takes a course in mathematical logic and learns how to do elaborate and terrible things to basic arithmetic. But if you all you care about is the logical properties of provability, there is an easier way!


Expressing provability

Enter modal logic, a type of philosophical logic designed to handle possibility, necessity, and other modal notions of natural language. More recently, it was discovered that modal logic is perfectly adapted to treat provability, giving a clean and elegant characterisation of Gödel’s Theorems, and deeper insights into provability in formal systems. The goal of this post to explain how. I’m going to assume you know propositional logic and a little modal logic, though we won’t need much of the latter.


First, we need some way of expressing the provability of a statement. If p is a statement, e.g. ‘‘1+1=2”, then let □p be the statement “p is provable”. We call □ the provability predicate, since it acts like an adjective applied to the sentence p. More formally, it is an operator which takes a proposition and returns a proposition, or a propositional operator. Now, we could be thinking about provability in a particular formal system, like Peano arithmetic. I will explain what this is below. But the nice thing about logic is that it frees us from the messy details of any particular system and lets us focus on deductive relations instead.


For the time being, we just fix a formal system F, with some semantics (a notion of what statements are true in the system) and a syntax (a way of proving statements in the system). If p is true (from the semantics), we write F⊨p. If we can prove p (from the syntax), we write F⊢p. (We usually omit F.) We call F sound if F⊢p implies F⊨p, and complete if F⊨p implies F⊢p. Gödel’s theorems show that ⊢p, ⊢□p and ⊨□p are distinct but related in interesting ways!


To illustrate, suppose I want to say that F is inconsistent. By definition, that means that F can prove something false. We let ⊥ denote falsum, a logical constant which always evaluates to false; if you prefer, choose a particular contradiction, e.g. ⊥=p∧¬p. (Its partner is the constant true, or verum, ⊤.) So F is inconsistent iff we can prove a falsehood,



Now we can easily state Gödel’s Theorems. The First Theorem means that, for some statement p, we have ⊨p∧¬□p, i.e. p is true but not provable. The second says



If you can prove you’re consistent, you must be lying!

Source: https://hapax.github.io/mathematics/logic/philosophy/provability/




Τελευταία Ενημέρωση στις Τετάρτη, 21 Οκτώβριος 2020 13:32