Αγορά Πολιτών

Τρόπος Συμμετοχής


Πολίτες στην Αγορά

Έχουμε 758 επισκέπτες συνδεδεμένους


Location: Northern Germany


Citizen Band Radio:

- Channels: 11-19 AM (amplitude modulation)

- Callsign: EB-1142

Accountability-Free Genocides


Militarized "psychiatry"


The Absolute Evil


Gang-stalking Greeks


Byzantine Atrocities


European Dissidents ALARM


Human Rights' Court


The used up men


Dissidents - USG RICO crimes


Open Letter to Theresa May


Open Letter to António Guterres UN's SG


Triangulation - Zersetzen


Open Letter to Andrew Parker, MI5


Πράξεις ποταπές - Despicable choices



My father's death


Cavitation damage


Burglary and vandalism


Dry mini submarine


Message to Bundeswehr 2


Message to Bundeswehr 1


“Tough” guys and TOUGH guys


Μοναδική λύση, το Χόλιγουντ




Zeppelin: Beyond Gravity


Foreign intervention in Greece?


Η ανελεύθερη Ελλάδα


Η Ελλάδα καταγώγιο;


Αν.Επ. Π. Παυλόπουλο


Intangible prisons


Plausible deniability


Images of German w & s


Crimes against Humanity


"Chimera" - "Bellerophon"


pr. Donald Trump



Legal Notice 87


Βδέλλες, αποικιοκρατικές


Being a German


Legal Notice 84


Dirty colonial methods


Georgi Markov, BG - KGB


Samples of Barbarity


Ελλάδα - αποκόλληση


Έλληνες, στο έλεος...


Harvester's log 16/3/17



Legal Notice 66




Legal Notice 62



My story






Η Εστία μου



Why so untidy?






Εξόντωση Ελλήνων αντιφρονούντων;



Ζήτημα εμπιστοσύνης






Ανοικτή Επιστολή πρέσβη ΗΠΑ

Αφορμή, U2RIT vs Ελλάδα;


A request to U2RIT

Colonial aggression - 2

Open Letter to UN S.G.

Open Letter to p.C. & p. O.

Δήλωση πρόθεσης επαναπατρισμού


Ο "εφιάλτης" της Νυρεμβέργης

Συλλογή Φωτογραφιών

Αίτημα προστασίας, προς Ιταλία

Chroma key, background removal

Science and Ethics

Να συμβάλει και η U2RIT

Θα ξαναφτιάξουν πολλές φορές Άουσβιτς και Zyclon B


Split-Screen effect

Η Ζωή είναι Ωραία.

Βόρεια Κορέα

Λευτεριά στους Έλληνες, εξανα- γκαστικά "Εξαφανισμένους"


Μυστικές δίκες;


Πολιτισμό, ή, απληστία;

Ακραία Στυγνότητα

Η Τέχνη της Επιβίωσης

Political Asylum 3

Επιστροφή στις ρίζες

The Human Cost of Torture

An urgent appeal for solidarity

More obvious than the Sun

Western "culture"

Political Asylum

Έννομη Προστασία

Μια μήνυση που εγείρει ερωτηματικά




Honor your father...


Creative Greeks

A pair of Dictatorships

Human Rights, Civilization, Rule of Law and Neutrality PDF Εκτύπωση E-mail
Αξιολόγηση Χρήστη: / 0
Συνεννόηση για Δράση - Απόψεις
Συντάχθηκε απο τον/την Χρήστος Μπούμπουλης (Christos Boumpoulis)   
Παρασκευή, 24 Αύγουστος 2018 13:05
Gang Stalking: Nowhere To Hide- With Eric Karlstrom
Human Rights, Civilization, Rule of Law and Neutrality
There are the founding principles ot the United Nations’ Organization and the related international treaties.
There is the International Law Order.
The notion of a State’s Political Neutrality has nothing to do with either, serving the international treaties signed by that State as an U.N.’s member, nor, with that State’s obligation to refrain from any, active and/or passive, complicit to the International Law Order’s downfall.
The obidience to the International Law, concerning the Human Rights, remains a legal issue and not a political issue.
There is no conflict between Nations (or group of Nations) when a Nation (or a, formal or informal, group of Nations) violates, systematically, either, the International Law, or, the Human Rights, against, either, another Nation as a whole, or, another Nation’s members. Instead, it is an unprovoked rebellion, of a Nation (or a, formal or informal, group of Nations) against the international community as a whole.
There is an, according to my opinion, ongoing, unprovoked rebellion against the international commutity, on behalf of the colonizing, informal federation U2RIT (the United Kingdom, the United States of America, the Russian Federation, the Israel and the Turkey). This group of Nations violate, arbitrarily and systematically, the International Law and the Human Rights of innocent foreign citizens, thus threatening the existence of the International Law Order and the Human Rights of the members of our human kind, as a whole.
The colonizers violate the international treaty by which colonialism has been baned.
The colonizers violate the International Law for the Human Rights by many ways.
The contemporary colonialism exploits, in general, the colonizing method by which, the innocent Nation of the Tasmanians has been extincted.
Initiall, either a distinct, martial race, like the Gurkhas, is being enslaved and turned to an invading, colonizing army, or, members of the targeted Nation, meaning normal citizens, are being enslaved, after having, involuntarily, been drugged and maddened (borderline personalities) by opiates (and/or other chemical substances) beforehand, and turned to a domestic, colonizing army.
The colonizing “Gurkhas” with the support of the colonizing Metropolis; occupy, almost, the entire, targeted Nation’s administration infrustructure; issues legislation that bans any access, on behalf of the corresponding citizens, to the formal judicial files and criminal records; perpetrate against innocent, children and adult, civilians false incriminations (even while these victims having, ever, not even a clue about these false incriminations) in order to adulterate their judicial files and criminal records, thus depriving them from their Human Rights;  methodize the slandered citizens’ becoming enslaved by becoming, involuntarily and unsuspectedly, brain implanted, thus becoming subjected to the atrocious technology of Remote Neural Sensing; degrade, the enslaved civilians to human “guinea pigs” in order to, involuntarily and unsuspectedly, subject them to scientific and/or medical and/or pharmaceutical and/or military experimentation; methodize the, involuntary and unsuspected, removal of the enslaved civilians’ internal tissues/organs for smuggling; fabricate false incriminating evidence and/or conduct gangstalking (zersetzen torture which is a death-program), against any legitimate political dissidents, in order, to institutionalize them and/or to degrade, by deliberately causing illnesses to them or murder, them; methodize the exchange of the targeted Nation’s population; methodize the annexation of the targeted Nation’s teritory; serve the colonizing Nations’ illegitimate interests; committ innumerable crimes of every kind as a direct consequence of soly their imposed borderline personality; abuse the atrocious Remote Neural Monitoring technology in order to induce, upon legitimate political dissidents a state of enforced poverty, and social and professional marginalization, in order to slander them and perpetrate their unjust and illegitimate institutionalization.
The manifestation of the involuntary transhumanism has nothing to do with any kind of bilateral or multilateral conflict; it is a rebellion against our human kind’s Human Rights.
The manifestation of the contemporary colonialism has nothing to do with any kind of bilateral or multilateral conflict; it is a rebellion against the international community’s Law Order.
Concluding, I wish to express my concern that, the non-colonizing Nations which complicit, either, actively, or, passively, if such Nations exist, to the ongoing U2RIT’S unprovoked rebellion against both, the International Law Order, as well as, our human kind’s Human Rights, they may, sometime in the near future, find themselves missing from the, under development, quasi “map” of Civilization, thus, indirectly enforcing to themselves a, de facto, total disassociation with all the, actually, civilized Nations of our world, for many, many centuries to come.
Christos Boumpoulis
P.S.: Public evidence for the above claims exist, in excess, over the Internet and elsewhere.
Pacta sunt servanda
Pacta sunt servanda (Latin for "agreements must be kept"), a brocard, is a basic principle of civil law, canon law, and international law.
International Law
With reference to international agreements, "every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith." Pacta sunt servanda is related to good faith, while pacta sunt servanda does not equate with good faith[clarification needed]. This entitles states to require that obligations be respected and to rely upon the obligations being respected. This good faith basis of treaties implies that a party to the treaty cannot invoke provisions of its municipal (domestic) law as justification for a failure to perform. However, with regards to the Vienna Convention and the UNIDROIT Principles it should be kept in mind that these are heavily influenced by civil law jurisdictions. To derive from these sources that pacta sunt servanda includes the principle of good faith is therefore incorrect.
The only limit to pacta sunt servanda are the peremptory norms of general international law, called jus cogens (compelling law). The legal principle clausula rebus sic stantibus, part of customary international law, also allows for treaty obligations to be unfulfilled due to a compelling change in circumstances.
Neutrality, Political
Political neutrality is a position a nation-state adopts regarding a particular conflict. Politically neutral countries maintain a neutral stance toward warring parties for the duration of a conflict, although certain countries, such as Swedenand Switzerland, and Belgium until 1914, extend neutrality to all conflicts so that such stances become permanent over time. Political neutrality has its basis in international law and common principles of international society, but it is termed political in the sense that it is influenced by domestic political factors, and as a chosen policy serves a country’s national interests.
Politically neutral parties are not indifferent to conflict (they may still provide humanitarian assistance or other forms of nonmilitary aid to needing parties). For instance, while many countries did not provide military assistance in any form to the recent American-led Iraq War, several neutral countries have provided (and continue to provide) large amounts of bilateral humanitarian assistance. Furthermore, politically neutral countries are not necessarily pacifist in principle, as they still maintain armies for protection and they will fight for reasons of self-defense, as Belgium did in World War I when Germany invaded in 1914.
In order for neutrality to be viable, it must be granted and respected by other states. This assumes that nation-state behavior is rule-governed. As an intellectual approach to international politics, the Grotian tradition (named after Hugo Grotius, a seventeenth-century jurist) assumes that rules and principles operate within international politics. Also termed the international society tradition, and developed by scholars such as Hedley Bull, Martin Wight, Adam Watson, R. J. Vincent, Robert H. Jackson, and Nicholas Wheeler, this perspective still assumes that states operate within anarchy—or the lack of a central, overarching political authority that can adjudicate grievances. Additionally, the Grotian tradition does not assume that these rules will inevitably abolish interstate conflicts. Yet it asserts that in certain contexts (both spatial and temporal), nation-states hold in common certain values and interests that are binding upon members of the international society. Political neutrality is one such recognized common interest.
While many international principles have informed how neutrality has been understood in international politics, three are noteworthy. First, states that are neutral toward the internal conflict of another nation-state (civil wars) do so out of respect for the sovereignty of that country. Sovereign states have exclusive political authority throughout the geographic regions they occupy. A second and related principle is pluralism, or that there are multiple conceptions and ways of life (rather than one universal) that any state may wish to pursue. Third, there is the principle of pacta sunt servanda, which translates, “pacts must be respected.” This principle assumes states keeping their promises. Agreements among states can only be binding if there is the assumption that, once entered, states will maintain those agreements through time.
The most explicit example of international recognition for neutrality, the Second Hague Convention (1907), grew out of what Grotian scholar Bull termed a European international society in his Anarchical Society (1977, pp. 31–36). Throughout the eighteenth, nineteenth, and early twentieth centuries European countries developed a body of international settlements and laws that were expressed in certain institutions (such as the Concert of Europe). At the Second Hague Convention, neutral countries such as Belgium, Sweden, and Switzerland were granted formal recognition in Articles V (The Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land) and XIII (Naval War). These articles declared, most importantly, that the land of neutral countries was “inviolable.”The Second Hague Convention is still recognized law and the most important statement recognizing the rights of neutral countries.
While international recognition is important for a nation-state’s political neutrality to be viable, there are many domestic influences that pressure states into neutrality (either permanently or temporarily). Three key sets of reasons for political neutrality include:
Instrumentalist Neutrality is the most cost-effective position a country can take regarding a conflict. A nation-state remains uninvolved in a dispute because the dispute is unpopular with and costly for nationally important economic and political interest groups. In instrumentalist situations, one or more warring parties may try to induce countries out of neutral positions by providing economic incentives that would therefore make political neutrality no longer cost-effective. In other words, when such material incentives successfully induce neutral countries into conflicts, an instrumentalist set of influences was probably most responsible for the original politically neutral position.
Isolationist Neutrality is based upon both a cultural and economic component that influences a country’s conception of its national interest. Isolationists assert that their country should have only limited interaction with other countries. This stance has been especially popular with certain domestic interest groups that benefit from protectionist economic policies, but it also permeates the fabric of a country’s larger political culture. Isolationism prevailed in the United States, for example, during the inter-war period (1919–1941). This particular form of isolationism was based in the concept of American exceptionalism, or the belief that the United States held a unique place in the world and that, therefore, America could remain neutral toward, and removed from, the balance of powerpolitics underpinning European conflicts.
Normative Neutrality is chosen as a policy because there is no position for a country to take that would not threaten its own national vision. Normative political neutrality was the British policy toward the United States during the American Civil War (1861–1865). While the British had recognized the Confederacy as a legitimate “belligerent” party, and many Brits identified with the aristocratic landholders of the American South, the Emancipation Proclamation redefined (in British society) the American Civil War as a war over slavery. Even though neutrality proved materially very costly to Britain’s strategic and economic interests, the British could not side with the Confederacy as such an action would have engendered British anxiety over slavery.
In certain cases, like Switzerland, Sweden, and Belgium until 1914, neutrality is inherited as a political attribute that serves to define its social identity as a state. Belgium, from independence in 1830 until World War I, declared itself a “perpetually neutral” country. In this case political neutrality informs all decisions a state makes, during times of peace and war, and determines even the legal basis for whether and how to resist invading armies.
While neutrality seems to carry no guarantees, it should be noted that the territories of most neutral countries have been respected through time. Even in cases where neutrality has been compromised, the offending party often incurs widespread international condemnation for such a violation, as Germany did following the invasion of then-neutral Belgium in 1914.
ΝΟΜΟΣ 2472/1997
Άρθρο 12
Δικαίωμα πρόσβασης
2. Το υποκείμενο των δεδομένων έχει δικαίωμα να ζητεί και να λαμβάνει από
τον υπεύθυνο επεξεργασίας, χωρίς καθυστέρηση και κατά τρόπο εύληπτο και
σαφή, τις ακόλουθες πληροφορίες:
α) Όλα τα δεδομένα προσωπικού χαρακτήρα που το αφορούν, καθώς και την
προέλευσή τους.
Άρθρο 24
Υποχρεώσεις υπεύθυνου επεξεργασίας
5. Οι διατάξεις των άρθρων 11, 12, 13, και 19 παρ. 1 του παρόντος νόμου δεν εφαρμόζονται στο ποινικό μητρώο και στα υπηρεσιακά αρχεία που τηρούνται από τις αρμόδιες δικαστικές αρχές για την εξυπηρέτηση των αναγκών της λειτουργίας της ποινικής δικαιοσύνης και στο πλαίσιο της λειτουργίας της.
Remote Neural Monitoring: How They Spy on Your Thoughts
How many times did you have thoughts that you never wanted to share with anyone and have been constantly worried at the thought of someone ever finding out about these thoughts?  All of us have been through this process, and the new and improved technologies being developed around the world, supposedly to deal with crime and terrorism, and inadvertently intrude on one’s privacy, should probably bring us all to the brink of paranoia.  These technologies are funded by governments at the highest level and some of the countries involved include USA, UK, Spain, Germany and France.
Recently, the infamous National Security Agency (NSA) of the U.S.A. has developed a very efficient method of controlling the human brain. This technology is called Remote Neural Monitoring (R.N.M.) and is expected to revolutionize crime detection and investigation.
R.N.M. works remotely (ever wondered why have we all been driven relentlessly towards wireless systems?) to control the brain under the objective to detect any criminal thought taking place inside the mind of a possible culprit.  Inevitable question: How can you isolate a criminal thought if you do not have a comparative measure of non-criminal thoughts?
This undertaking is based on two principles:
1. The research studies have shown that the humanoid intellect thinks at a speed of about 5 kilobits per second and, therefore, does not have the capability to contest with supercomputers acting via satellites, implants and biotelemetry.
2. The human brain has a characteristic set of bioelectric resonance structure. By using supercomputers, the R.N.M. system can home in on it, and send messages through an embedded individual’s nervous system in order to affect their performance in a preferred way.
The entire system has been developed after about 50 years (!) of neuro-electromagnetic human experimentations, claimed to be involuntary, but there is no evidence to support this claim.  According to many scientists involved in this program (their names are not revealed for obvious reasons), within a few years it is expected that DNA microchips, under the guise of medical breakthroughs that will be presented to launch the disease cure processes on speed and efficiency, will be implanted in the humanoid cereberum, which would make it inherently controllable. R.N.M. will then have the ability to read and govern a person’s emotional mental procedures along with the involuntary and visions.
At present, around the world, supercomputers are watching millions of people at the same time, with the speed of 20 terabits per second, particularly in countries like USA, Japan, Israel and a number of European countries.  A similar program is supposedly under way in Russia.
How does R.N.M. work?  It employs a set of programs functioning at different levels, like:
1. The signals intelligence system which applies electromagnetic frequencies (EMF), to excite the brain for the system and the electronic brain link (EBL).
2. The Brain Stimulation system that has been planned as particle emission intelligence, which means receiving information from unintentionally created electromagnetic waves in the environment. However, it is not related to radioactivity or nuclear detonation.
3. The recording machines that have electronic equipment to examine electrical action in human beings from afar. This computer-generated brain charting can always record all electrical events in the cerebrum.
4. The recording aid system deciphers individual brain maps for security purposes.
The underlining technology of this system takes under consideration that the electrical activity in the speech center of the brain, can be translated into the subject’s verbal thoughts.  R.N.M. can send encrypted signals to the audio cortex of the brain directly circumventing the ear. This encoding assists in detecting audio communication. It can also perform electrical mapping of the cerebrum’s activity from the visual center, which is achieved by avoiding the eyes and optic nerves, consequently projecting imageries from the subject’s mind onto a video display. With this visual and audio memory, both can be visualized and analyzed.
The machinery involved can, remotely and non-invasively, detect information by digitally decoding the evoked potentials in 30-50Hz, 5 mW electromagnetic emissions from the cerebrum.  Evoked potentials are called the spikes and patterns created by the nerves, as they produce a shifting electrical pattern with an ever-changing magnetic instability, which then puts on a constant amount of electromagnetic waves. The interesting part about this is that the entire exercise is carried out without any physical contact with the subject.
The EMF emissions can be decoded into current thoughts and audiovisual perception, in the subject’s gumption. It sends complicated cyphers and electromagnetic pulse signals to activate evoked potentials inside the mind, consequently generating sound and visual input in the neural circuits. With its speech, auditory and visual communication arrays, R.N.M. allows for a comprehensive audio-visual mind-to-mind connection or a mind-to-computer association.
The mechanism needs to decrypt the resonance frequency of each specific site to modulate the input of information in that specific location of the cerebrum.
Furthermore, R.N.M. can detect audio via microwaves, and features the broadcast of precise directives into the subconscious, producing visual disorders, illusions and instillation of words and numbers into the brain through radiation waves.
With all the given paybacks for tracing the unlawful and traitorous activities, there are many alarms and dangers being pointed out by human rights advocates and scientists. The agencies of human rights, worldwide, have criticized the system as an affront to the basic human rights because it violates privacy and the dignity of considerations and events of life.
Several countries have opposed it and refer to it as an offence on their human and civil rights. Along with other biological concerns voiced by scientists, R.N.M. remains a controversial technology, which is being used in many countries for security maintenance and surveillance.
1. Robert C. Gunn, PhD, Arbor, Michigan, NSA clinical psychologist currently indicted for human and Constitutional rights violations of Mind Control. Extracts from the passage of the affidavit of the indictment.
2. Declassified documents by NSA of the MKULTRA project
3. R.G. Malech Patent #3951134  “Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves” USPTO granted 4/20/76
Consciousness on-off switch discovered deep in brain
By Helen Thomson
ONE moment you’re conscious, the next you’re not. For the first time, researchers have switched off consciousness by electrically stimulating a single brain area.
Scientists have been probing individual regions of the brain for over a century, exploring their function by zapping them with electricity and temporarily putting them out of action. Despite this, they have never been able to turn off consciousness – until now.
Although only tested in one person, the discovery suggests that a single area – the claustrum – might be integral to combining disparate brain activity into a seamless package of thoughts, sensations and emotions. It takes us a step closer to answering a problem that has confounded scientists and philosophers for millennia – namely how our conscious awareness arises.
Many theories abound but most agree that consciousness has to involve the integration of activity from several brain networks, allowing us to perceive our surroundings as one single unifying experience rather than isolated sensory perceptions.
One proponent of this idea was Francis Crick, a pioneering neuroscientist who earlier in his career had identified the structure of DNA. Just days before he died in July 2004, Crick was working on a paper that suggested our consciousness needs something akin to an orchestra conductor to bind all of our different external and internal perceptions together.
With his colleague Christof Koch, at the Allen Institute for Brain Science in Seattle, he hypothesised that this conductor would need to rapidly integrate information across distinct regions of the brain and bind together information arriving at different times. For example, information about the smell and colour of a rose, its name, and a memory of its relevance, can be bound into one conscious experience of being handed a rose on Valentine’s day.
The pair suggested that the claustrum – a thin, sheet-like structure that lies hidden deep inside the brain – is perfectly suited to this job (Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B, doi.org/djjw5m).
It now looks as if Crick and Koch were on to something. In a study published last week, Mohamad Koubeissiat the George Washington University in Washington DC and his colleagues describe how they managed to switch a woman’s consciousness off and on by stimulating her claustrum. The woman has epilepsy so the team were using deep brain electrodes to record signals from different brain regions to work out where her seizures originate. One electrode was positioned next to the claustrum, an area that had never been stimulated before.
When the team zapped the area with high frequency electrical impulses, the woman lost consciousness. She stopped reading and stared blankly into space, she didn’t respond to auditory or visual commands and her breathing slowed. As soon as the stimulation stopped, she immediately regained consciousness with no memory of the event. The same thing happened every time the area was stimulated during two days of experiments (Epilepsy and Behavior, doi.org/tgn).
To confirm that they were affecting the woman’s consciousness rather than just her ability to speak or move, the team asked her to repeat the word “house” or snap her fingers before the stimulation began. If the stimulation was disrupting a brain region responsible for movement or language she would have stopped moving or talking almost immediately. Instead, she gradually spoke more quietly or moved less and less until she drifted into unconsciousness. Since there was no sign of epileptic brain activity during or after the stimulation, the team is sure that it wasn’t a side effect of a seizure.
Koubeissi thinks that the results do indeed suggest that the claustrum plays a vital role in triggering conscious experience. “I would liken it to a car,” he says. “A car on the road has many parts that facilitate its movement – the gas, the transmission, the engine – but there’s only one spot where you turn the key and it all switches on and works together. So while consciousness is a complicated process created via many structures and networks – we may have found the key.”
“Consciousness is created via many structures and networks but we may have found the ignition key”
Awake but unconscious
Counter-intuitively, Koubeissi’s team found that the woman’s loss of consciousness was associated with increased synchrony of electrical activity, or brainwaves, in the frontal and parietal regions of the brain that participate in conscious awareness. Although different areas of the brain are thought to synchronise activity to bind different aspects of an experience together, too much synchronisation seems to be bad. The brain can’t distinguish one aspect from another, stopping a cohesive experience emerging.
Since similar brainwaves occur during an epileptic seizure, Koubeissi’s team now plans to investigate whether lower frequency stimulation of the claustrum could jolt them back to normal. It may even be worth trying for people in a minimally conscious state, he says. “Perhaps we could try to stimulate this region in an attempt to push them out of this state.”
“We could try to stimulate the region in a minimally conscious person to try to jolt them out of this state”
Anil Seth, who studies consciousness at the University of Sussex, UK, warns that we have to be cautious when interpreting behaviour from a single case study. The woman was missing part of her hippocampus, which was removed to treat her epilepsy, so she doesn’t represent a “normal” brain, he says.
However, he points out that the interesting thing about this study is that the person was still awake. “Normally when we look at conscious states we are looking at awake versus sleep, or coma versus vegetative state, or anaesthesia.” Most of these involve changes of wakefulness as well as consciousness but not this time, says Seth. “So even though it’s a single case study, it’s potentially quite informative about what’s happening when you selectively modulate consciousness alone.”
“Francis would have been pleased as punch,” says Koch, who was told by Crick’s wife that on his deathbed, Crick was hallucinating an argument with Koch about the claustrum and its connection to consciousness.
“Ultimately, if we know how consciousness is created and which parts of the brain are involved then we can understand who has it and who doesn’t,” says Koch. “Do robots have it? Do fetuses? Does a cat or dog or worm? This study is incredibly intriguing but it is one brick in a large edifice of consciousness that we’re trying to build.”
Turning Gurkhas into a new 'Victim Race'
The bizarre Battle of the Excluded Gurkha, led by Joanna Lumley, sheds light on the crisis of meaning in today's Tory and Labour parties.
First things first: all Gurkhas and their families should be free to settle in Britain. They should benefit fully from Britain's social services, healthcare and education system. All discrepancies in pay and pensions between British-born soldiers and foreign-born Gurkhas should be ironed out (1). If Britain is going to employ non-British citizens in its military forces, then it must guarantee them equal treatment and pay, instead of keeping the Gurkhas as a pet caste of money-saving, second-class military men.
However, the current Battle of the Excluded Gurkha, the campaign led by the clipped-toned actress Joanna Lumley to secure right of residence in the UK for retired Gurkhas, has become about something more than equal treatment. It has become bound up with contemporary politics – in particular with the development of a shallow brand of 'New Conservatism' and with the utter collapse of the New Labour government's moral and popular authority.
The Gurkha campaign shows the extent to which the traditional wing of the elite – the Telegraph-reading, Tory-supporting officer classes, for whom the Gurkhas have always been 'loyal friends' – has embraced the politics of victimology over old-fashioned ideals of militarism and superiority. And it shows the extent to which the current ruling section of the elite – the non-officer-classes of New Labour – is now so bereft of purpose and direction that it can be rattled by the so-called 'forces of conservatism' it claimed to have defeated in the late 1990s.
Not for the first time, the Gurkhas are being used as a proxy army – only this time not to defend the interests of British imperialism, but rather to try to uncover some idea of 'British values' here at home, and to shift the pieces on the depressing chessboard that is contemporary British politics.
Reading about the current pro-Gurkha campaign – led by Lumley, daughter of Major James Rutherford Lumley, who served with the 6th Gurkha Rifles in the British Indian Army, and backed by virtually the entire media – you could be forgiven for thinking that the Gurkhas have only recently been treated badly. That in Major Lumley's days in India, or 'Inja', they had a lovely life and it is only under the tyranny of uncaring, bureaucratic New Labourites that they have been turned into second-class soldiers.
Not so. The Gurkhas have always been treated as second class, as loyal but peculiar, as a race apart, as less intelligent than the white leaders of the British Army but a bit more trustworthy than the everyday wogs of Nepal, Burma and India. Indeed, the Gurkhas have long been an institutional expression of inequality: they were made and sustained, not by British decency, but by British racism.
The Gurkhas are a creation of Britain's old colonial policy of 'divide and rule'. Hailing from Nepal, and named after the eighth-century Hindu warrior saint Guru Gorakhnath, they were first recruited into the British Army following the Anglo-Nepalese war of 1814 to 1816, when British forces defeated Gurkha forces yet were impressed by their courage and tenacity. The Gurkhas were named a 'Martial Race' – that is, a race of people who were naturally brave, loyal and bloodthirsty. In the subcontinent under British rule from the early 1800s to the mid-twentieth century, the British tended to divide local peoples into two camps: 'Martial Races', those considered well-built for fighting, and 'Non-Martial Races', those judged to have 'sedentary lifestyles' and thus to be unsuited to serving in colonial armies: too slothful, inactive, uncreative, lazy (2).
This discovery of 'Martial Races' occurred across the British Empire. Sikhs in India were also judged to be a 'Warrior Race' who could be trusted to join colonial armies in order to crush uprisings amongst the 'unruly' sections of Indian society; the Masai in Kenya were also judged a 'Warrior Race' when they were considered useful for shoring up British rule in Kenya (3). Not surprisingly, the distinction between Martial Races and Non-Martial Races corresponded neatly with those who generally supported British colonialism, or who benefited from it, and those who did not: in other words, behind the separation of Third World peoples into 'brave' camps and 'sedentary' camps, there lurked the low politics of divide and rule. The Gurkhas became more institutionalised into the British military than any other 'Martial Race', forming their own brigade and fighting in the First World War, the Second World War, the colonial wars, the Falklands, Kosovo and Iraq. They became the colonial people employed to put down other colonial peoples.
The Gurkhas were discussed in explicitly racial terms. For nineteenth-century British colonialists, the inhabitants of south Asia were, for the most part, a disgusting and unthinking mass, lacking the intelligence or humanitarian instincts of the white race. In the 1860s, one British officer said 'Asiatic soldiers' do not have 'the same pluck or moral courage as the European... unless drugged and maddened by opiates beforehand' (4). One British observer said Indians and other south Asians 'live in a different stage of civilisation and intellectual development... their only courage is apathy and their valour consists in animal ferocity. A native soldier, of whatever rank, has no heroism, and he is ignorant of honour in every acceptation of the word.' (5) Gurkhas, by contrast, were considered not to be 'fully Asiatic', since they were brave and more loyal than other, non-heroic, dishonourable Asiatic peoples (6).
However, even when the Gurkhas were championed, it tended to be on the basis that their non-European racial features – their status as a Martial Race – made them perfect fighting machines. In the Victorian era, one writer said the great thing about the Gurkhas is that they do not have 'a very high estimate of the value of life'; they are 'less encumbered by the mental doubts or humanitarian sentiment [of Europeans], and thus not so moved by slaughter and mutilation' (7). This image of Gurkhas as peculiarly fearless and emotionless has been exploited by the British military and military historians right up to the modern period – and it has, as one critical author said in 1990, tended to 'deny the humanity of these soldiers' (8).
That Gurkhas are now being treated as second-class citizens, different even from those non-British, Commonwealth members of the military who are granted full residential rights in the UK, is not all that surprising: their origin is as a band of fighters more trustworthy than your average Asian but 'less equal' than your average Westerner. It is not merely New Labour thoughtlessness that has made these men second-class soldiers, but rather the long history of their cultivation as 'good wogs' whose lack of humanitarianism could be harnessed for British imperialist ends. As late as last year, three Gurkhas lost a High Court case in which they sought to challenge their payment of pensions that were around '24 per cent to 36 per cent' of normal military pensions (9). Such treatment is an ugly historical hangover from the fact that the Gurkhas have long been seen, effectively, as 24 to 36 per cent human.
The history of the Gurkhas explains the curious divide over their predicament today. The conservative wing of British society, those descended from the officer classes who look upon Gurkhas as their honourable servants, have enthusiastically embraced the new Gurkha cause. New Labour, meanwhile, which may be as militaristic as ever, but which lacks any institutional link to the old colonial practices of the past, seems completely desensitised to the 'Gurkha issue'. Now a middle-class party that draws its MPs from think-tanks rather than from actual tanks, it seems blasé about the Gurkhas. The televised stand-off between Joanna Lumley, that well-spoken daughter of colonialism, and Phil Woolas, the bumbling, bureaucratic, northern-voiced minister for immigration, captured well the divide on the Gurkha issue.
However, it would be wrong to see this as some profound class clash, as some no doubt fantasise that it is. Rather, the Gurkha campaign exposes the hollowing out of both big-C Conservatism and New Labour.
Brain Implant Victim Tips
From prisoner of wars
Doctors & special interest groups implanting adults & children secretly during surgery in order for research, extermination & exploitation (Voices, Electric Shocks, Unnatural Physiological Rewiring, Maiming, Torture & Sexual Abuse)
When I was younger, I was walking home from school when a shady looking fellow passed by and directly blew smoke into my face. When I got home my nose/sinuses flared & began to stuff up with mucus. That night it got to the point where I could not breath through my nose. I was sent to the hospital where they (A Chinese & 2 Jews) immediately decided to perform surgery to remove "adenoid flare up". And that was the end of my life. I have been a slave/prisoner of these kooks ever since and have only found out recently what this entails.
First: Yes you do have a "brain Implant" (Material piece of technology) in your head (Inserted Through the nose or back of throat) most likely from a surgery you had along time ago. It uses low "radio" frequencies hooked up to a computer that translates them & sends/receives into thoughts, emotions, physical/mental actions, etc.
It can do pretty much anything with/to your body/mind.
Second: You have been targeted. Reasons differ.
Third: The best thing for you to do is to move back to your country of nationality/ancestry, become a citizen of that country & cancel the other citizenship. Get in contact with organizations against these implants/mind slavery.
Fourth: DO NOT go to a psychiatrist. They WILL diagnose you with schizophrenia.
Fifth: The people around you DO NOT know what is happened to you. The implant in your head is effecting them because the people on the computer (who implanted you) are sending the people around you things through YOUR own brain, making it look semi-natural. They are also BLOCKING other people from NATURALLY contacting you. The people around you are ignorant of your predicament.
SIX: You are being what they called, "suicide" (Job Sabotage, Social Sabotage & Mental/Physical Sabotage)
Seven: These people are sick criminals, twisted doctors, professors & even special interest organizations and "students" & GOVT.
Eight: People "in the know" will not help because they are
1: Ignorant & have a false sense of security and of what is REALLY happening to you and the capabilities of the technology.
2: Threatened with being "hooked up" (hearing tons of voices)
3: Are the sick perpetrators. This IS BLOOD FUED (Racial Holy War)
Nine: TRY AND REMEMBER WHEN THE LAST TIME YOU WENT UNDER (sleep) FOR SURGERY WAS. Buy yourself what is called an "ENDOSCOPE" (4 millimeter video model if you can afford it). Use this to view your sinuses and
back of your throat & adenoid area. You should see the scar tissue where they made the incision. Once you have found the area where they inserted it get an ULTRASOUND of the area or an MRI. You should see a tiny implant about the size of an Tylenol/Advil/M&M.
TEN: Find someone to pull it out, however you should have it done awake, with friends/family watching & video taped the doctors every move. If this is not feasible you may perform the surgery yourself. In addition to the video endoscope (4mm) you will also need a "rhino-scope" (4mm) w/ scalpel and tong/clamp attachments & some liquid Novocain. The best way to pull it out is first breath some vics vapor rub. Turn on & insert your Endoscope while video-taping. Then dip a small piece of medical cloth in the Novocain & clamp it in your rhino-scope. Insert that and numb the area you will be performing on. Insert a dry piece of cloth near/under the Incision point for blood. Have some "quick-clot" (US Marine Soldier Medical Powder) on hand just in case. Begin to make small incisions into the scar tissue until you find the implant. If the implant has wires attached sever them with the scalpel, you can pull them out later, remove the implant with the Rhino-scope tongs. View this implant under a micro-scope and record all the information/data on it.
ELEVEN: Congratulations, you are now free from all the pedophile, criminal, homosexual, atheist, communists in the world, however, They will most likely retaliate by what called "hooking you up" Prepare to experience tons of voices 24 hours a day, BUT, this will fade away over time and certainly is a small price for freedom because THEY CAN NO LONGER ACTUALLY HURT OR INJURE YOU OR DO ANYTHING EFFECTING YOU PHYSICALLY WITHOUT THE IMPLANT. Sticks, stones & implants may brake your bones but words will never hurt you.
Note: Do NOT tell your doctor/psychiatrist (They are NOT your friends) you have a "brain implant". Just say you got some small object shoved way in your head when you were younger & never got around to getting it out or something to that effect. Remember the implant is most likely up the back of your throat inside near the base of your brain.
It has been discovered there are New York Public Health Laws and New York Mental Health Laws that are being used to strip New Yorkers of their New York "STATE" Civil Rights secretly, allowing "State of New York" authorities to destroy any New Yorkers health and life without notification of the persons affected. The same kinds of actions are happening to all persons in other "states", under their own states laws.
To make things worse there are other New York State laws that allow state authorities to evade admitting that they have secretly declared a person incompetent for subsequent nomination into a deadly human experiment using covertly installed in the body devices (in vivo) that emit deadly energy, while the person is completely unaware and going about their daily tasks and going to work. Even if the person's doctor or lawyer were to ask the authorities, the authorities decide whether to tell them or not and according to law, do not have to tell them, unless the victim has substantial evidence and takes the authorities to court. If a person's doctor or lawyer knows of what is happening to the victim, they won't tell the victim, because they are licensed with the state and therefore obligated not to aid uncovering an ongoing human experiment "lawful investigation".
The attacks on people throughout the nation and world vary, where the technology ranges from implanted in the body devices emitting deadly energy to other techniques of implanted in the body tracking devices to allow them to be efficiently stalked by authorities teams of harassers and also tracking devices to allow the use of deadly radar beams to be sent into their bodies location. The general issue is that the people are having their immune systems traumatized to destroy their health and minds. Many of the victims report torture level pain in a virtual sentence of death.
In States like New York the laws allow federal authorities like the agency Health and Human Services (HHS), military authorities like the CIA, hospitals, universities, institutions, private corporations and doctors, to operate under permission of written New York State laws; the entities mentioned are therefore by law given permission to operate in the State of New York by New York itself, those entities however are still obligated to obey the other laws of New York State that protect a person, which the entities are not obeying. The entities are also obligated not to breach New York States CONSTITUTIONS CIVIL RIGHTS OF NEW YORKERS; therefore the entities from other than the state itself are actionable for liability for breaching the peoples civil rights, just the same as state authorities are liable when they have ignored a persons civil rights. Thereby all of the attacks reported by people throughout the nation are being allowed by the respective STATES laws that the person lives in. The issue therefore is that in order to bring a complaint to stop the attacks it can and should be brought first in a STATE Court, because the STATE authorities are in action as permitting the activity even where it is from federal authorities for example. This is known from our having found the laws that specify the state gives permission for the entities to operate inside New Yorks jurisdiction. The specific laws that allow such atrocities will be outlined in detail in this articles next installment.
It sounds impossible, it is not, there are such laws here in New York and there appears to be the same laws, with somewhat different wording that allow for the same thing to happen, in the other 49 states.
There are several thousand people over the last 15 or so years telling of their being attacked and or used in human experiments that have destroyed their lives, these people were leading normal lives and suddenly their world was turned upside down by State authorized authorities making up for their state budgets deficits by designating people falsely to be "incompetent" and selling the victimized people for use in human experiments for profit. The old saying is, "if you follow the money the truth will be found"; the money motive is a part of the issue of why a person is chosen, because the states need money and they also have men and women without conscience that will do whatever they are ordered to do. Not like you, where your conscience would bother you to pick some New Yorker or people in another state to experiment on, knowing full well their life would be destroyed. Because of the authorities and media ignoring this injustce many of the victims of this abuse have died.
Imagine you wake up and find yourself the target of the authorities, who are really covertly silently torturing you and no authorities will listen to you or help you at all. The electronic pulsing devices do not only cause extreme pain, but are designed to affect the frontal lobe of the brain to depreciate judgment, in effect a reducing the intellect of a person. As the laws are today you too are also at risk for the same thing happening, as well also your family and friends and acquaintances; the potential really exists that you have already been implanted and the authorities have not turned it on or high enough for you to notice it. The laws are on the books and the activities are well known to be going on, there are innumerable websites discussing the attacks on people throughout the nation. One person having this happen to them, is one too many.
The discussion of people affected varies as to how to get the attacks to stop. There has until now been confusion about the source of jurisdictional responsibility of the attacks, resulting in people taking their cases incorrectly to the federal courts; it has been shown by law the states are responsible and not the federal government. Not to say the federal government is not involved; it is a fact however the states are permitting the attacks upon a New Yorkers, Californians, Texans or whatever state the person lives in, where federal or other entities are in action.
Gathering sufficient evidence is what is needed to gain a hearing in court, it has been difficult to do under the circumstances that the authorities call the attacks "human experiments or research", as a cover for their unconstitutional crimes. The general issues for most of those claiming to be affected is the common thread of their experiences with other victims, such similar reports amount to evidence by commonality; that essentially says to an observer, that something more than mass hysteria is occurring.
The victims reporting here in this article have gathered substantial evidence of various kinds and their evidence conforms to courts requirements for a hearing. It is now in the hands of the Court to do the right thing, or cause further litigation of the case where it may ultimately wind up having to be appealed and by due diligence of Lamb and Mecca, wind up in a federal court; that will in all likelihood result in the federal court enforcing their New York State Constitutional Civil Rights, where they coincide with their federal Constitutions' Civil Rights.
You might have asked yourself why attorneys have been unable or unwilling to bring a complaint into court, why detectives produce nothing they will back up in a court, why doctors see nothing; well there are laws in New York and other states that hold them criminally liable for exposing an ongoing "so called" human experiment quantified in the eyes of the authorities as being a "lawful investigation" of a suspect/subject. Such so called "lawful investigation" have the full weight of law to enforce the maintenance of secrecy, so that the experiments remain secret, thereby the laws prevent licensed with the state authorities from rendering "honest service" to victims. Where the licensed professionals such as attorneys, private detectives and doctors may well appear to be helping, they always fall short of the goal because they are compromised by the laws, if they are not actively misleading the victim. The laws that allow what is described are unconstitutional, but are used by authorities as if they were constitutional; the laws for maintaining secrecy of investigations to keep victims from getting evidence by the state authorities, is by keeping all licensed with the state professionals on a legal leash. Many of the licensed with the state professionals and authorities have exhibited actions and attitude of sanctioning such atrocities. The same reasonings are why the news media has ignored the victims plight. The only way out is through a court where the activities are exposed.
Some of those who are being experimented on have made an effort to get the problem resolved by going to court. That may seem like the intelligent response to do, to get something so offensive to stop, but it has been a nightmare for those making the attempt in court; due to another set of authorities laws and policy and case law that support State authorities allowance to lie compounding the problem. Such that the authorities can legally deny all knowledge of the activity, leaving the victim without any ability to get to the truth unless their court case is properly structured. To most of you who read this, it may seem impossible the authorities are allowed to lie in consideration of what's being complained about, but the issue has been decided in court cases that have found for State authorities being allowed to lie while in pursuit of a "lawful investigation" of a suspect/human subject; where in our case we are talking about the authorities pursuit of a person who is a human experiment. Licensed with the state professionals are not supposed to help or aid a victimized person to expose the activity, professionals who don't want to go along could be subject to retaliation by authorities, in being threatened with jail or loose their license to enforce secrecy; such threats have no real weight and those professionals that go along are guilty of conspiracy to defraud. That anybody can have the State step in and seize them as their guardian by nominating the person incompetent secretly without notice is inherently illegal and on the opposing side supported that it is illegal by case law. The licensed professionals are not free from responsibility, they are actionable and not free from liability where they are silent or go along with authorities, on the basis of the egregious nature of the actions authorized by authorities. What is being done to people in the 50 states, is against their guaranteed state Constitutions Civil Rights of persons. These are some of the reasons for all the secrecy by authorities, being they can be stopped and the authorities know that, their main objective is to keep victims from going to court and that is their highest priority.
As victims we have been fighting for our lives trying to stop the insidious atrocity in court, it is a fight critical and crucial to saving our own lives, as well as to help save the lives of many people in New York and throughout the United States where we win. The two affected new Yorkers, John and Debbie have been diligent in searching out a means to produce evidence where the evidence gathered has not been dependent upon licensed authorities; as a part of their evidence they have used a special advanced electronic test according to an electromagnetic standard test of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., which is the world's leading professional association for the advancement of technology, setting standards for industry and governments around the world. They have gathered other evidences as well to support their case.
How did we get to this depraved state of human rights abuse and what can be done to reverse the trend of adoption of Nazi like legal allowances to have our State Constitution Civil Rights of persons of any state taken away. These actions of state authorities taking away a person's rights without telling anyone that they are really stealing the body and mind of a person to torture or kill them, is just like a judicial secret star chamber of rogue judges deciding who lives and who dies. The actions of authorities described in this article are a new form of corruption for use by authorities in personal vendettas, legitimate activist assassinations, money making, power and outright sadistic training of other authorities to learn how to do an attack upon a person. That is an issue for the courts to remedy you may think, well there are two people in Court in New York who are also victims and as of this June 2nd 2010, they are attempting to turn this extraordinary immoral activity around and make such vague laws illegal through case law. The Plaintiffs in court being Deborah Lamb and John Mecca are being egregiously affected with pain and suffering from electronic torture by implanted devices, they are currently scheduled for a hearing this July in Long Island New York, of their well supported and properly organized case. You are asked to forward this article to all and anyone whom you believe cares, who has lost hope, who can further spread the word and to those who may want to attend the hearing to show support. Also we need your Prayers that justice prevails and we win.
Implantable devices for torture
The following is not an immutable fact. That is to say the devices do not have to be small to avoid detection. This is because there are such things as chemical capacitors and plastic microchip circuits. The implant as an issue of its functionality is possible to be primarily a capacitor being the virtual battery, several capacitors such as the ultrapacitor variety behave like batteries, as for their charging it can be done by several methods such as a thermopile, RFID antenna made of semiconductive plastic or ultra thin ( 2 to 4 atoms wide of any metal so as to be thin enough not to show up and be coiled up, as well batteries ( I doubt batteries are used anymore as the ultrapacitor is a superior hybrid having the advantages of bot battery and capacitor wrapped up in a new chemical ultrapacitor). The guts being the transceiver can be as stated plastic. Such a device made of plastic composition and deformed into a myriad of body tissue compatible forms would be very easy in evading medical imaging. Factoring this in puts a serious damper on detection by medical scan observation for the artistically crafted new immoral implants. I do not say they are impossible to image either as I believe properly tweaked an MRI could cause substantial interferrence tooccur around the implant, but which of the radiologist technicians has the know how and will to do that. The time is changing, hopefully Bush will not declare martial law and the new President whether McCain or Obama are I think equal as to the possibility to get this fiendish Nazi activity to stop. For the moment we are endeavouring to design a way to detect the devices more effectively and idientify their exact location in the body for removal and to possibly deactivate them. This process of engineering may take monts or years, which of us has that long to get somewhere in defeating the technology. We should all pray to God that this scourge on mankind is rended and destroyed. It will take all our concerted efffort for a political change so please keep up your efforts as you know we will also continue until the enemy is defeated.
Source: www.sites.google.com/site/mindcontrolslave/brain-implant-victim-tips
Τελευταία Ενημέρωση στις Παρασκευή, 14 Ιούνιος 2019 21:20