Αγορά Πολιτών

  International Criminal Court - Submission of Claims 2/7/2018

To: The International Criminal Court at Hague, the office of the Prosecutor, Mrs. Fatou Bensouda.

From: Mr. Christos Boumpoulis

Date 2/7/2018

Subject: Official submission of Claims 2/7/2018.

Your Excellency Mrs. Fatou Bensouda,

This letter constitutes a formal submission of claims against those countries, whichever they might be, excluding Germany, from now on called the “perpetrators”, who signed the May 21, 1949 secret treaty between Germany and the military winners of the Second World War for perpetrating, in combination, the crime of aggression, against Greece and the war crime of appropriation of property, against Germany.

Greece remains, for at least 65 years under a state of coup d' étet which is been perpetrated by, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, the Russian Federation, Israel and Turkey.

During June 2010, the members of Greece's political system perpetrated the treason of not terminating the “Hugh Cooper & Co” treaty and by this way they methodically imposed Greece's bankruptcy, while Greece possesses mineral reserves of enormous monetary value.

There is no peace treaty between Germany and the “perpetrators”, which they remain under the state of a truce, since the, alleged, end of the Second World War.

The “perpetrators” by abusing the May 21, 1949 secret treaty, appropriated enormous monetary capital, from the German Pension Organizations and from the German Banking System, in order to finance and perpetuate, Greece's illegitimate coup d' étet establishment.

By this way, the “perpetrators” methodically, try to, also, impose an unnatural division between, the German and Greek, Nations which, actually, remain, indistinguishably, kind and excellent, brother Nations.

Therefore, I kindly ask from you to exercise your authority in order, 1. to terminate the war crime of appropriatin of property, against Germany and to enforce the return to Germany of its appropriated monetary capital increased with a penalty of, at least, one hundred percent (100%) of its initial value and 2. to terminate the crime of aggression against Greece and enforce the “perpetrators” to pay to Greece adequate monetary reparation that will prevent, the “perpetrators” in the future from not daring to even think of repeating, neither, the war crime of appropriation of property nor, the crime of aggression, nor, to intervene by any means into the existing, quasi, Platonic love between the, excellent and kind, German and Greek, Nations.

Sincerely,

Christos Boumpoulis

economist

Exhibits

1. Article 8 (2) (a) (iv)

War crime of destruction and appropriation of property

Elements

1. The perpetrator destroyed or appropriated certain property.

2. The destruction or appropriation was not justified by military necessity.

3. The destruction or appropriation was extensive and carried out wantonly.

4. Such property was protected under one or more of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.

5. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that protected status.

6. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international armed conflict.

7. The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.

2. Article 8 bis74

Crime of aggression

Introduction

1. It is understood that any of the acts referred to in article 8 bis, paragraph 2, qualify as an act of aggression.

2. There is no requirement to prove that the perpetrator has made a legal evaluation as to whether the use of armed force was inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.

3. The term “manifest” is an objective qualification.

4. There is no requirement to prove that the perpetrator has made a legal evaluation as to the “manifest” nature of the violation of the Charter of the United Nations.

Elements

1. The perpetrator planned, prepared, initiated or executed an act of aggression.

2. The perpetrator was a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of the State which committed the act of aggression.

3. The act of aggression – the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations – was committed.

4. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that such a use of armed force was inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.

5. The act of aggression, by its character, gravity and scale, constituted a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.

6. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established such a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.

3. The prominent Greek, constitutional law professor George Kasimatis testifies that, there is a coup d' étet in Greece and that, the Eurozone member-States are financially supporting it. Γ Κασιμάτης: 1ο Μνημόνιο - Πραξικόπημα & Κατοχή, www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_DJKs_LjsI

4. The prominent Greek military general George Aifantis testifies that, the entire Greek political system, during June 2010, committed treason against Greece by not terminating the "Hugh Cooper & Co" treaty. ΑΫΦΑΝΤΗΣ ΚΟΥΠΕΡ NEWSΚΟΣΜΟΣ, www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiP2DlSCIBc

4. In the spirit of clarification, I directed the following three points to Professor Schneider:

(i) Two days prior to the enactment of the German constitution on 23 May 1949, a Secret Treaty (Geheimer Staatsvertrag) was signed, which gave complete Allied control over electronic and print media, film, culture and education until the year 2099.

As a result thereof, there are still 100,000 occupation troops in Germany; after 66 years there still has been no peace treaty concluded between Germany and the Victorious Allied Powers; and all of Germany’s gold reserves are held in the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in which the Rothschilds have a 57% shareholding.

This treaty has been confirmed by Major-General Gerd-Helmut Komossa, former head of German Military Intelligence in his book “Die Deutsche Karte” (The German Card).

(ii) There appear to be two constitutions. According to a resolution of the Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgericht) of 17 August 1956, “It is upheld that the German Reich has outlasted the collapse of 1945 and has never gone under or fallen, either through capitulation or through the exertion of foreign state authority in Germany by the Allies, or in the later course of time; it is still an entity with legal capacity, even though it is not fully operable as a government due to a lack of organization. The Federal Republic of Germany is NOT the successor of the German Reich”.

It needs to be noted that the Constitution of the Third Reich dates back to the North German Constitution of 1866. The principal reason why it still exists is because only the German High Command surrendered on 8-9 May 1945, and not the German Government.

Furthermore, the 1949 Constitution is termed the Basic Law, because it is a provisional constitution, pending unification of the lost territories. So far, only central Germany has been reunified – 3 October 1990. The eastern territories, as defined by the 1937 borders, still remain under Polish and Russian control.

Source: https://www.defendevropa.org/exclusive/modern-germany-illegal-state/

5. By the way, The fact that Germany is not a sovereign state is not a conspiracy theory. The German Minister of finance Dr. Wolfgang Schauble said during the European Banking Congress on November 18 2011: “But in Germany since May 8, 1945 [the unconditional surrender of the German Wehrmacht] at no time have we been fully sovereign”.

Source: https://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/germany-not-sovereign-state

5. Gerd-Helmut Komossa reveals the uncomfortable truth about the post-war conditions, dictated by the US and its allies. The state treaty, dated May 21, 1949 and classified by BND as top secret, suggests restrictions of state sovereignty of the Federal Republic of Germany, introduced for a period until 2099. These restrictions include the provision that the winning coalition exercise complete control over Germany's mass media and communications; that every Federal Chancellor is to sign the so-called Chancellor Act; that the gold reserve of Germany is kept under arrest. In fact, all the German Chancellors, including the incumbent Chancellor Angela Merkel, pay their first foreign visit necessarily to the United States. The whole spectrum of German political parties is supervised by a special Washington-based controlling body, while local US-licensed media serve as a more sophisticated means of brainwashing than the Nazi propagandist machine. Meanwhile, Germany's territory is still occupied by US troops. This astonishing picture is not a fancy concoction of a political leftist. It is drawn by a military man whose mind has accumulated the experience of several crucial stages of development of the European civilization and Germany in particular. Gen. (Ret.) Gerd-Helmut Komossa took part in World War II and later in the Cold War. Possessing huge amounts of information, he analyzes the existing mechanisms of global policy with strong criticism. Joining the Wehrmacht in 1943 as a volunteer, Komossa served at the Eastern front. Between May 1945 and April 1949, he was a prisoner of war. In the USSR, he got acquainted with many Russians who appeared to be quite different from the image imposed by the official Nazi propaganda. Since 1956, he served in the German Bundeswehr, re-established under certain conditions. The above mentioned secret treaty admitted that the German sovereignty is sufficient for the right to build up military forces.

Source: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-183232