Αγορά Πολιτών

Τρόπος Συμμετοχής

Χορηγίες

Πολίτες στην Αγορά

Έχουμε 375 επισκέπτες συνδεδεμένους

Επικοινωνία

Γερμανία 004917667046073 

 Μόνο S.M.S.

Gang-stalking Greeks

 

Byzantine Atrocities

 

European Dissidents ALARM

 

Human Rights' Court

 

The used up men

 

Dissidents - USG RICO crimes

 

Open Letter to Theresa May

 

Open Letter to António Guterres UN's SG

 

Triangulation - Zersetzen

 

Open Letter to Andrew Parker, MI5

  

Πράξεις ποταπές - Despicable choices

 

 

My father's death

 

Cavitation damage

 

Burglary and vandalism

 

Dry mini submarine

 

Message to Bundeswehr 2

 

Message to Bundeswehr 1

 

“Tough” guys and TOUGH guys

 

Μοναδική λύση, το Χόλιγουντ

 

Charlatans

 

Zeppelin: Beyond Gravity

 

Foreign intervention in Greece?

 

Η ανελεύθερη Ελλάδα

 

Η Ελλάδα καταγώγιο;

 

Αν.Επ. Π. Παυλόπουλο

  

Intangible prisons

 

Plausible deniability

 

Images of German w & s

 

Crimes against Humanity

 

"Chimera" - "Bellerophon"

 

pr. Donald Trump

 

  

Legal Notice 87

 

Βδέλλες, αποικιοκρατικές

 

Being a German

 

Legal Notice 84

 

Dirty colonial methods

 

Georgi Markov, BG - KGB

 

Samples of Barbarity

 

Ελλάδα - αποκόλληση

 

Έλληνες, στο έλεος...

 

Harvester's log 16/3/17

 

 

Legal Notice 66

 

Execrable

 

Legal Notice 62

 

  

My story

 

  

Aggression?

 

  

Η Εστία μου

 

  

Why so untidy?

 

  

Αποικιοκρατία

 

  

Εξόντωση Ελλήνων αντιφρονούντων;

 

  

Ζήτημα εμπιστοσύνης

 

  

Μεθοδικότητα

 

  

Ανοικτή Επιστολή πρέσβη ΗΠΑ

Αφορμή, U2RIT vs Ελλάδα;

Βιοηθική

A request to U2RIT

Colonial aggression - 2

Open Letter to UN S.G.

Open Letter to p.C. & p. O.

Δήλωση πρόθεσης επαναπατρισμού

 

Ο "εφιάλτης" της Νυρεμβέργης

Συλλογή Φωτογραφιών

Αίτημα προστασίας, προς Ιταλία

Chroma key, background removal

Science and Ethics

Να συμβάλει και η U2RIT

Θα ξαναφτιάξουν πολλές φορές Άουσβιτς και Zyclon B

 

Split-Screen effect

Η Ζωή είναι Ωραία.

Βόρεια Κορέα

Λευτεριά στους Έλληνες, εξανα- γκαστικά "Εξαφανισμένους"

 

Μυστικές δίκες;

Trustworthiness

Πολιτισμό, ή, απληστία;

Ακραία Στυγνότητα

Η Τέχνη της Επιβίωσης

Political Asylum 3

Επιστροφή στις ρίζες

The Human Cost of Torture

An urgent appeal for solidarity

More obvious than the Sun

Western "culture"

Political Asylum

Έννομη Προστασία

Μια μήνυση που εγείρει ερωτηματικά

 

 

 

Honor your father...

Noise

Creative Greeks

A pair of Dictatorships

International Criminal Court - Submission of Claims 4/6/2018 PDF Εκτύπωση E-mail
Αξιολόγηση Χρήστη: / 0
ΧείριστοΆριστο 
Συνεννόηση για Δράση - Απόψεις
Συντάχθηκε απο τον/την Χρήστος Μπούμπουλης (Christos Boumpoulis)   
Δευτέρα, 04 Ιούνιος 2018 17:09
Fatou-Bensouda_web.jpg
 
International Criminal Court - Submission of Claims 4/6/2018
  
To: The International Criminal Court at Hague, the office of the Prosecutor, Mrs. Fatou Bensouda.
From: Mr. Christos Boumpoulis
Date 4/6/2018
Subject: Official submission of Claims against the United Kingdom.
 
Your Excellency Mrs. Fatou Bensouda,
This letter constitutes a formal submission, towards the International Criminal Court, at Hague, of Claims against the United Kingdom, of committing, against Greece, the crimes against humanity of,  apartheid, of other inhumane acts and of forced pregnancy.
For the committment of these crimes, the United Kingdom uses the members of the non-uniformed, colonizing army of "Stay Behind", named also "Gladio".
The young members of non indingenous Greeks, mostly but not exclusively, the kids of the Nomads are being provided by unlimited supplies of hashish in order for them, at their own words, "to smoke hashish all day long". Later, during their adulthood and after having been criminalized and subjugated by Greece's colonizing establishment, they are given "gate keeping" positions within the Greek State in order to promote and safeguard the perpetuation of this establishment, along with the colonizing Metropolis' material interests.
The colonizers need slaves in order for them, to perpetuate their establishment in Greece; to missapropriate each and every promissing domestic, business activity; to use them as "guinea pigs" for conducting inhumane and involuntary scientific/medical/pharmaceutical experiments; and to perform involuntary human harvesting. The colonizers produce these slaves as follows.
Many unmarried and mail, indigenous Greeks become framed by the method of entryism (erectile dysfunction, induced emotional dependency, induced pseudo-homosexual behaviour, induced pseudo-paraphilia behaviour, enforced financial/social/professional/biological/mental/etc instrumental pseudo-"problems" induced by the combination of, illegitimate and covert administration of chemical substances; gang-stalking; and electronic brain implants' that induce synthetic telepathy). And when they have fallen under a state of perceived, false "vulnerability" an, usually Nomad but, allways subjugated, female is introduced into his life. Under these circumstances and due to the gradual, instrumental, elimination of their misfortunes, the unmarried, indigenous Greeks  are led to forced, mixed marriages.
The enslavement of their children; the manipulation of the indigenous Greek husbands; the missapropriation of their business/real-estate wealth; the missapropriation of nationality-related rights; and their political manipulation, are the intended outcomes of these enforced marriages.
Also, in cases that, there is an intense interest, on behalf of the colonizers, for a promishing, domestic business activity which, the indigenous and married Greek owner refuses to sell, the colonizers by using the above mentioned instrumental means, actually destroy the owner's marriage and then, they enforce a second mixed marriage with a subjugated wife.
In Greece, during the past, approximatelly, seventy years, enforced pregnancies are being perpetrated by the instrumental means of the enforced, mixed marriages.
Also, the control of most of the promishing, domestic economic activity is  being transfered to the colonizing establishment by, systematically, using, also, as an instrumentall means,  also, the enforced, mixed marriage.
Most of the enforced, mixed marriages become sources of, enslaved, children and unsuspected marrital spoucies. These slaves, either, comply with the colonizers'l interests after having, one way or another, decline from their own Human Rights, or, they, arbitrarily become designated, by the colonizers, as "targeted individuals" and consequently, they become the innocent victims of the contemporary colonialism, which, actually, perpetrates a true, "silent haulocaust"; and which, has turned, what was, previously, considered as "correctional system" and "mental-institutions", to its smokeless, true "crematoria".
This is how Greece remains atrociously colonized, during the past seventy years; and this is way, members of the Greek Parliament which, during June 2010 treason, of not terminating the "Hugh Cooper & Co" treaty, remain, today, members of the Greek Parliament, and even worst, while manifesting outworldy audacity, they conduct worthless, "patriotic" public speaches and publicly claim that, they "pursue" Greece's Freedom and Prosperity.
Concluding, I would like to assure you that, by your, potential, intervening to the colonizing atrocities, which are being perpetrated against Greece, you may also, contribute to our human kind's rescuing from the calamity of the contemporary colonialism which, as it seems, threatens to turn, each and every member of humanity to transhumanized entities, meaning quasi "orgadrones" that embed the mentality of an authentic, hominini-gorillini, chimpanzee.
Sincerely, 

Christos Boumpoulis
 
Evidence
Few years ago, from a person that was almost certainly related to the Russian FSB, which belonged to the Nation of the Nomads and under undoubtful sincearety on its behalf (as, that person, at the specific occassion, comprehended, wrongfully, that my life expectancy was not longer than four hours, due to previous "active measures" against me which were undertaken by a group of people not necessarily unrelated with this person) revealed to me the following unverified information:
During, approximately, June 1942 – February 1943, while, the German army was advancing towards Stalingrad, there was an exchanging of written messages, between individuals within the German army and individuals within the Russian army, taking place. These messages were referring the names of Russian Khazars.
Those Russian Khazars were refusing, to become enlisted to the Red Mafia and also, after having declined from their own Human Rights, to become perpetrators of the Red Mafia's criminality.
Those messages were orders for murdering those Khazarian dissidents.
These, ordering the commitment of murders, written messages are being stored in the basement of a specific Russian museum the name of which, I do nor recollect.
Any potential, on behalf of the contemporary Khazars, refusal, to enlist into the contemporary Red Mafia, automatically leads to the murder of those dissidents.
The contemporary Khazarian Nation is a totally militarized, non-uniformed organizational form as, any potential Khazarian dissident is, actually, never allowed to live.
Source: Christos Boumpoulis
 
An attempt to transform Greece into a British protectorate
At a critical point for the fate of the Greek Revolution, in the summer of 1825, with Ibrahim, on the one hand, almost having burned the entire Peloponnese and Riesid Mehmet (Kioutachi) had shrouded Mesolonghi in a siege ring, Mavrocordatus, at Georges Kunning's suggestion, submits to the executive body a "draft report" by which Greece was asking to be placed under the protection of Great Britain. The document was signed by almost all members of the cabinet, the members of Nafplio as well as the ecclesiastical hierarchy, as well as some chieftains (except 2-3 dissidents) and sent it to England. Following this, British Ambassador to Istanbul, Stagford was recalled and replaced by the nephew of the British Prime Minister, Statford Kunnigs. The latter came to talks with Mavrocordatos and Zografos, as representatives of the Greek government, who, in order to secure British protection, accepted Greece to resign from its request for full independence and to accept subordination to the Sultan, as the English sought. However, this plan was rejected by the High Gate and was not implemented. His tough opponents stood, initially, Th. Kolokotronis, who was later agreed, after the defeat in the Battle of the Trikrorfon and Dim. Ypsilantis, unsubstantiated, denouncing it in a speech at the Third National Assembly in Epidaurus (April 1826), as a consequence of which he was punished with deprivation of his political rights for a year. The majority of the struggling people was opposed to the "draft report", arguing that the revolution should call for the protection of all Christian European nations, not unilaterally, and for their own reasons, the Frenchophile Kolettis, and Gouras, refused to sign it and G. Kountouriotis also. The Minister of Justice (Justice) I. Theotokis has totally disagreed, and for this reason he was sentenced to three months jail in Bourtzi, while Adamantios Korais from Paris expressed his disapproval in writing dated July 24, 1825. Also two important philhellenes, the French general Ross and the American Georgios Taussen Washington complained about the "draft report" to the Nafplion government. The latter, with a newer reference, revealed that the editor of the "draft report" was the English Commissioner of the Ionian Islands, Adam.
Source: www.el.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ελληνική_Επανάσταση_του_1821
 
Percentages agreement
The Percentages agreement was a secret agreement between British prime minister Winston Churchill and Soviet leader Joseph Stalin during the Fourth Moscow Conference in October 1944. It gave the percentage division of control over Eastern European countries, dividing them into spheres of influence. Franklin Roosevelt was consulted tentatively and conceded to the agreement. The agreement was officially made public by Churchill twelve years later in the final volume of his memoir of the Second World War. The US ambassador Averell Harriman, who was supposed to represent Roosevelt in these meetings, was excluded from this discussion.
British historian Andrew Roberts states:
the Second Moscow Conference was not able to resolve major issues in Eastern Europe, and when Churchill did complete his percentages deal with Stalin, it was not ratified by the Americans.
The agreement
Winston Churchill, not Stalin, proposed the agreement, under which the UK and USSR agreed to divide Europe into spheres of influence, with one country having "predominance" in one sphere, and the other country having "predominance" in another sphere. According to Churchill's account of the incident, Churchill suggested that the Soviet Union should have 90 percent influence in Romania and 75 percent in Bulgaria; the United Kingdom should have 90 percent in Greece; and they should have 50 percent each in Hungary and Yugoslavia. Churchill wrote it on a piece of paper which he pushed across to Stalin, who ticked it off and passed it back. The result of these discussions was that the percentages of Soviet influence in Bulgaria and, more significantly, Hungary were amended to 80 percent.
Churchill called it a "naughty document".
Some historians, including Gabriel Kolko and Geoffrey Roberts believe that the importance of the agreement is overrated. Kolko writes :
There is little significance to the memorable and dramatic passage in Churchill's autobiography recalling how he and Stalin divided Eastern Europe ... Stalin's "tick," translated into real words, indicated nothing whatsoever. The very next day Churchill sent Stalin a draft of the discussion, and the Russian carefully struck out phrases implying the creation of spheres of influence, a fact Churchill excluded from his memoirs. [British Foreign Minister] Anthony Eden assiduously avoided the term, and considered the understanding merely as a practical agreement on how problems would be worked out in each country, and the very next day he and [Soviet Foreign Minister] Vyacheslav Molotov modified the percentages in a manner which Eden assumed was general rather than precise.
Henry Butterfield Ryan writes, that "Eden and Molotov haggled over these quantities as though they were bargaining over a rug in a bazaar, with Molotov trying, eventually successfully, to trim Britain's figures."
Most historians consider the agreement to be deeply significant, however. In The Cambridge History of the Cold War, Norman Naimark writes that together with the Yalta and Potsdam agreements, "the notorious percentages agreement between Joseph Stalin and Winston Churchill...confirmed that Eastern Europe, initially at least, would lie within the sphere of influence of the Soviet Union."
In his acclaimed biography of Churchill, Roy Jenkins writes that the agreement "proposed Realpolitik spheres of influence in the Balkans. The [Foreign Office] record reported [Churchill] as saying that 'the Americans would be shocked if they saw how crudely he had put it.'" Historian David Carlton similarly notes that "[With the October contract] a clear if informal deal had been done on the point that mattered most to Churchill: he had Stalin's consent to handle Greece as he saw fit." Anthony Eden wrote that months before the meeting, he and Churchill had discussed the issue and "we felt entitled to ask for Soviet support for our policy [with regard to Greece] in return for the support we were giving to Soviet policy with regard to Romania." Carlton recounts that
[Churchill told Franklin Roosevelt] on 31 May…that the proposed Anglo-Soviet arrangement applied only to war conditions and was not an attempt to carve up the Balkans. Roosevelt was unimpressed and on 11 June held that the result would be "the division of the Balkan region into spheres of influence despite the declared intention to limit the arrangement to military matters." Churchill then urged the President to consent to the arrangement being given a three-month trial. And on the 13th Roosevelt rather weakly gave way…This turned out to be a decision of great importance.
Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentages_agreement
 
'Treaties or scraps of paper?'
To the Editor of The Daily Telegraph
Sir,
Last Saturday’s leading article on “Abyssinia: Our Duty” is welcome indeed after the advice liberally offered to the Emperor of Abyssinia by some sections of the English Press, urging him to submit to Italy, not because the Italian blackmail is just, but because it would be so inconvenient for ourselves if he resisted.
We might be called on to do more than lip-service to the League; and how extravagant would that be!
Twenty-one years ago, when the consequences of honoring our obligations were far more menacing, we were indignant enough at the suggestion that treaties were, after all, only “scraps of paper.” But geography plays strange tricks with justice. Italy is breaking at least three solemn pledges in her aggression on a fellow member of the League – the very type of aggression that the League was created to prevent: but many of us do not find it matters very much. The League has not yet called on us; but there are already plenty of voices busy finding pretexts for us to shuffle out of the whole thing.
It is not our duty to defend Abyssinia single-handed – no-one has suggested it; but it is our duty, if covenants mean anything whatsoever, to oppose this piece of brigandage at Geneva, and after. It is our duty to be concerting with whatever Powers retain some decency, particularly the United States, what measures may be needed.
Europe has at its disposal sanctions that Italy could not defy, provided we have the courage to use them. But instead of that the English Press, with a few honourable exceptions, has been taken up with nauseating discussion of our own interests. Later on, one gathers, we shall be very firm with Italy about the water of Lake Tana. Meanwhile, Ethiopian blood is a cheaper commodity.
If this is to be the way of our world, why make treaties at all? Let us at least have the courage of our cynicism. Let us have done with covenants, since they no longer serve to deceive anybody. Let us have done with the League, since “collective security” means simply the security of those strong enough to be secure. And then, if we perish in the chaos for which the world is heading, it will at least be without having canted to our last breath.
This jungle-law may have ruled between nations in the past; the time is rapidly approaching when either it ends or else the world. If the League cannot enforce one law for weak and strong, black and white, sooner or later we are finished. And if we flinch every time a test arises, we shall have deserved it.
[From a letter by F. L. Lucas of King's College, Cambridge, British anti-appeasement campaigner, to The Daily Telegraph, 25 July 1935]
Source: www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abyssinia_Crisis
 
Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples
Adopted by General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960
The General Assembly,
Mindful of the determination proclaimed by the peoples of the world in the Charter of the United Nations to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small and to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,
Conscious of the need for the creation of conditions of stability and well-being and peaceful and friendly relations based on respect for the principles of equal rights and self-determination of all peoples, and of universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion,
Recognizing the passionate yearning for freedom in all dependent peoples and the decisive role of such peoples in the attainment of their independence,
A ware of the increasing conflicts resulting from the denial of or impediments in the way of the freedom of such peoples, which constitute a serious threat to world peace,
Considering the important role of the United Nations in assisting the movement for independence in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories,
Recognizing that the peoples of the world ardently desire the end of colonialism in all its manifestations,
Convinced that the continued existence of colonialism prevents the development of international economic co-operation, impedes the social, cultural and economic development of dependent peoples and militates against the United Nations ideal of universal peace,
Affirming that peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law,
Believing that the process of liberation is irresistible and irreversible and that, in order to avoid serious crises, an end must be put to colonialism and all practices of segregation and discrimination associated therewith,
Welcoming the emergence in recent years of a large number of dependent territories into freedom and independence, and recognizing the increasingly powerful trends towards freedom in such territories which have not yet attained independence,
Convinced that all peoples have an inalienable right to complete freedom, the exercise of their sovereignty and the integrity of their national territory,
Solemnly proclaims the necessity of bringing to a speedy and unconditional end colonialism in all its forms and manifestations;
And to this end Declares that:
1. The subjection of peoples to alien subjugation, domination and exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights, is contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and is an impediment to the promotion of world peace and co-operation.
2. All peoples have the right to self-determination; by virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.
3. Inadequacy of political, economic, social or educational preparedness should never serve as a pretext for delaying independence.
4. All armed action or repressive measures of all kinds directed against dependent peoples shall cease in order to enable them to exercise peacefully and freely their right to complete independence, and the integrity of their national territory shall be respected.
5. Immediate steps shall be taken, in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories or all other territories which have not yet attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accordance with their freely expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, creed or colour, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and freedom.
6. Any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.
7. All States shall observe faithfully and strictly the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the present Declaration on the basis of equality, non-interference in the internal affairs of all States, and respect for the sovereign rights of all peoples and their territorial integrity.
 
Article 7 (1) (j) - Crime against humanity of apartheid
Elements
The perpetrator committed an inhumane act against one or more persons.
Such act was an act referred to in article 7, paragraph 1, of the Statute, or was an act of a character similar to any of those acts.
The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established the character of the act.
The conduct was committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups.
The perpetrator intended to maintain such regime by that conduct.
The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
The perpetrator knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
 
Article 7 (1) (k) - Crime against humanity of other inhumane acts
Elements
The perpetrator inflicted great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health, by means of an inhumane act.
Such act was of a character similar to any other act referred to in article 7, paragraph 1, of the Statute
The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established the character of the act.
The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
The perpetrator knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
 
Article 7 (1) (g)-4 - Crime against humanity of forced pregnancy
Elements
The perpetrator confined one or more women forcibly made pregnant, with the intent of affecting the ethnic composition of any population or carrying out other grave violations of international law.
The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
The perpetrator knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
 
Article 7 (1) (c) - Crime against humanity of enslavement
Elements
The perpetrator exercised any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership over one or more persons, such as by purchasing, selling, lending or bartering such a person or persons, or by imposing on them a similar deprivation of liberty.
The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
The perpetrator knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
 
Projecy MKULTRA
One 1955 MKUltra document gives an indication of the size and range of the effort. It refers to the study of an assortment of mind-altering substances described as follows:
• Substances which will promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness to the point where the recipient would be discredited in public.
• Substances which increase the efficiency of mentation and perception.
• Materials which will cause the victim to age faster/slower in maturity.
• Materials which will promote the intoxicating effect of alcohol.
• Materials which will produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way so they may be used for malingering, etc.
• Materials which will cause temporary/permanent brain damage and loss of memory.
• Substances which will enhance the ability of individuals to withstand privation, torture, and coercion during interrogation and so-called "brain-washing".
• Materials and physical methods which will produce amnesia for events preceding and during their use.
• Physical methods of producing shock and confusion over extended periods of time and capable of surreptitious use.
• Substances which produce physical disablement such as paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.
• Substances which will produce a chemical that can cause blisters.
• Substances which alter personality structure in such a way the tendency of the recipient to become dependent upon another person is enhanced.
• A material which will cause mental confusion of such a type the individual under its influence will find it difficult to maintain a fabrication under questioning.
• Substances which will lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men when administered in undetectable amounts.
• Substances which promote weakness or distortion of the eyesight or hearing faculties, preferably without permanent effects.
• A knockout pill which can be surreptitiously administered in drinks, food, cigarettes, as an aerosol, etc., which will be safe to use, provide a maximum of amnesia, and be suitable for use by agent types on an ad hoc basis.
• A material which can be surreptitiously administered by the above routes and which in very small amounts will make it impossible for a person to perform physical activity.
The Church Committee report in 1976 found that, in the MKDELTA program, "Drugs were used primarily as an aid to interrogations, but MKULTRA/MKDELTA materials were also used for harassment, discrediting, or disabling purposes."
Source: en.wikipefia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra

 

Τελευταία Ενημέρωση στις Τρίτη, 05 Ιούνιος 2018 10:16