Αγορά Πολιτών

Τρόπος Συμμετοχής


Πολίτες στην Αγορά

Έχουμε 925 επισκέπτες συνδεδεμένους


Slovenia +38630791147

Militarized "psychiatry"


The Absolute Evil


Gang-stalking Greeks


Byzantine Atrocities


European Dissidents ALARM


Human Rights' Court


The used up men


Dissidents - USG RICO crimes


Open Letter to Theresa May


Open Letter to António Guterres UN's SG


Triangulation - Zersetzen


Open Letter to Andrew Parker, MI5


Πράξεις ποταπές - Despicable choices



My father's death


Cavitation damage


Burglary and vandalism


Dry mini submarine


Message to Bundeswehr 2


Message to Bundeswehr 1


“Tough” guys and TOUGH guys


Μοναδική λύση, το Χόλιγουντ




Zeppelin: Beyond Gravity


Foreign intervention in Greece?


Η ανελεύθερη Ελλάδα


Η Ελλάδα καταγώγιο;


Αν.Επ. Π. Παυλόπουλο


Intangible prisons


Plausible deniability


Images of German w & s


Crimes against Humanity


"Chimera" - "Bellerophon"


pr. Donald Trump



Legal Notice 87


Βδέλλες, αποικιοκρατικές


Being a German


Legal Notice 84


Dirty colonial methods


Georgi Markov, BG - KGB


Samples of Barbarity


Ελλάδα - αποκόλληση


Έλληνες, στο έλεος...


Harvester's log 16/3/17



Legal Notice 66




Legal Notice 62



My story






Η Εστία μου



Why so untidy?






Εξόντωση Ελλήνων αντιφρονούντων;



Ζήτημα εμπιστοσύνης






Ανοικτή Επιστολή πρέσβη ΗΠΑ

Αφορμή, U2RIT vs Ελλάδα;


A request to U2RIT

Colonial aggression - 2

Open Letter to UN S.G.

Open Letter to p.C. & p. O.

Δήλωση πρόθεσης επαναπατρισμού


Ο "εφιάλτης" της Νυρεμβέργης

Συλλογή Φωτογραφιών

Αίτημα προστασίας, προς Ιταλία

Chroma key, background removal

Science and Ethics

Να συμβάλει και η U2RIT

Θα ξαναφτιάξουν πολλές φορές Άουσβιτς και Zyclon B


Split-Screen effect

Η Ζωή είναι Ωραία.

Βόρεια Κορέα

Λευτεριά στους Έλληνες, εξανα- γκαστικά "Εξαφανισμένους"


Μυστικές δίκες;


Πολιτισμό, ή, απληστία;

Ακραία Στυγνότητα

Η Τέχνη της Επιβίωσης

Political Asylum 3

Επιστροφή στις ρίζες

The Human Cost of Torture

An urgent appeal for solidarity

More obvious than the Sun

Western "culture"

Political Asylum

Έννομη Προστασία

Μια μήνυση που εγείρει ερωτηματικά




Honor your father...


Creative Greeks

A pair of Dictatorships

The unilateral warfare for the domination over the public space PDF Εκτύπωση E-mail
Αξιολόγηση Χρήστη: / 0
Συνεννόηση για Δράση - Απόψεις
Συντάχθηκε απο τον/την Χρήστος Μπούμπουλης (Christos Boumpoulis)   
Σάββατο, 09 Δεκέμβριος 2017 19:54

The unilateral warfare for the domination over the public space


After the recent project about the mini-submarines' dry, underwater station, I had the opportunity to think, about various common patterns with regard to incidents of the past seven years, at various European countries and to correlate those patterns with various corresponding historical facts.

The legitimate and honest citizens survive by deploying their presence, also, within the public space.

In the public space, one can have its own, true personality becoming recognized by his fellow citizens and simultaneously, he can develop interpersonal bonds of friendship with others which share with him the same, legitimate and honest, principles of living.

The set of interpersonal bonds along with the public recognition of ones, legitimate and honest, personal character constitute the basis of its own network of, legitimate, support.

Here are the elements of the line of thought:

  • Few months ago, I was reading, in a German University's library, an historical book about the circumstances in Austria, before the second world war. The book (“The Jews and the Germans”) was describing that, the then Jewish influence over the Austrian society was so intense that, in the public space, e.g. the theaters, etc, one, could see almost exclusively, Jews.

  • Organized stalking methods include warrantless electronic surveillance, slander, blacklisting, and a variety of psychological operations. The latter presumably exploit findings from studies such as the notorious MK Ultra experiments conducted on American and Canadian citizens by the CIA, as well as the aforementioned psychological torture tactics refined by the Stasi. In fact, as explained in the overview below, former CIA analyst and expert on the history of U.S. spying, George O’Toole wrote about a connection between the CIA and the aforementioned LEIUs. An organized stalking victim is systematically isolated and harassed in a manner intended to cause sustained emotional torment while creating the least-possible amount of evidence of stalking that would be visible to others. The process is sometimes referred to as “no-touch torture.” Methods are specifically chosen for their lack of easily-captured objective evidence. Perpetrators use common annoyances such as constant noise by neighbors or rude comments and abusive behavior by strangers, but on a frequent ongoing long-term basis. The cumulative effects of relentless exposure to such tactics can amount to psychological torture for the victim. Accomplices – such as neighbors, co-workers, and even friends or relatives of the victim in some cases – are recruited to participate (often unwittingly) by counterintelligence personnel using various means, such as by telling them that the target is a potential threat or that the target is the subject of an “investigation.” A whole set of psychological operations are perpetrated against targeted individuals. These methods, described in detail in the overview below, include such things as threats, slander, vandalism, abusive phone calls, computer hacking, tormenting the victim with noise, and “mobbing” (orchestrated verbal harassment by strangers, neighbors, or co-workers). Accounts by numerous victims of organized stalking share common specific details – suggesting that the perpetrators are following a well-tested and standardized playbook of methods that have proven to be easily kept off of the radar of potential witnesses and the mainstream news media. [http://www.gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/212-2/]

  • Harassment (a.k.a. “Subversion”) Tactics: In counterintelligence, to “subvert” or “neutralize” an enemy is to make it impossible for that enemy to go about his business. Gang stalkers seek to keep their victim in a constant state of agitation and hyper-vigilance so that he or she will find it almost impossible to function. This serves multiple purposes. For one thing, it makes it hard for the individual to pose a threat to the client of the gang stalkers – whether that is a corporation or a government. Note that – as discussed in detail elsewhere in this website – the distinction between corporations and the government is often meaningless in America, given the vast industry of private intelligence contractors with secret clearances, the use of the FBI and other agencies to serve corporate interests, and the lucrative revolving-door nature of employment between the public and private spheres in law enforcement and intelligence. This is another obvious purpose of gang stalking: income for the perpetrators. Another function of gang stalking is to exact revenge against the victim. Stalking is a form of extra-judicial punishment for anyone who crosses someone with connections to the vast homeland security infrastructure. Constant surveillance of targeted individuals (described above) is also an element of subversion. Anyone who knows that he or she is under constant surveillance will not only be inhibited from acting against the interests of the client of the gang stalkers, he or she will also find it difficult to fight back against the harassment or evade the surveillance itself because many efforts at counter-measures will be observed by the stalkers. In addition, anyone who is aware that he or she is constantly being watched by illegal spying will suffer the emotional trauma caused by having virtually no privacy. “Harassment” is an appropriate description of many of the individual acts perpetrated against gang stalking victims since they are intended to annoy, anger, and frustrate the targeted individual – rather than, say, physically injure him or her. On the other hand, “harassment” does not begin to convey the severity of the cumulative psychological effects of organized stalking. Slander, verbal abuse, noise, threats by strangers, constant surveillance, and other tactics, performed daily over a period of years will cause psychological torture, social isolation, and financial destruction. According to some anonymous sources, the overall process is sometimes called “slow kill.” Regardless of whether that term is actually used by perpetrators of gang stalking, it is an appropriate description. [http://www.gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/212-2/]

  • Historical origins of psychological torture methods: Some of the psychological operations tactics described below have ancient roots. For example, the use of noise to torment enemies dates back to the warfare of early civilizations – including the siege of Jericho in the Old Testament. Apparently, noise is still used in U.S. military psychological operations, although details about such tactics are mostly classified. As noted above, it is clear that many of the tactics used in organized stalking were also used by East Germany’s Stasi (state police), who referred to the overall process as “zersetzung der seele” (decomposition of the soul). Some of the core principles of organized stalking harassment are also used in military interrogations – such as those conducted on terrorist suspects at Guantánamo. Several of these concepts were documented by the sociologist Albert D. Biderman, in a 1957 journal article about coercive interrogation methods used by the Chinese to obtain confessions from American prisoners during the Korean War. Among the methods documented by Biderman were isolation (depriving the victim of social support), “monopolization of perception” (fixing the victim’s attention upon his or her immediate predicament), sleep deprivation, threats, “demonstration of omnipotence” (to suggest the futility of resistance), and degradation (including “demeaning punishments, insults and taunts, and denial of privacy). A copy of Biderman’s Chart of Coercion is on page 48 of this report. [http://www.gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/212-2/]

  • Blacklisting by threat assessment bureaucrats in the U.K. Based upon the reported facts, I would not refer to the following case as “gang stalking” in the full sense of the term. The incident did not involve the intense and sophisticated psychological operations tactics commonly associated with organized stalking by corrupt law enforcement and intelligence agencies and their contractors. This case was however a well-documented example of social and professional isolation of a targeted individual who was blacklisted by government bureaucrats. Articles published by the Guardian and BBC News in June 2009 reported that Jane Clift, a resident of the Borough of Slough in England had won a libel case against her borough’s council in which she claimed to have been falsely labelled as potentially violent after she complained about someone vandalizing a flower bed in a town park in 2005. The high court (trial court) awarded Ms. Clift £12,000 in libel damages. Ms. Clift had written an angry letter to the council after becoming frustrated during a phone conversation with the council’s “anti-social behavior coordinator.” The council then placed Ms. Clift on its “violent persons register” and then emailed people in the community about the fact that she had been placed on the list. An October 2010 article in the Daily Mail described her blacklisting ordeal as follows: Her details were circulated to an extraordinary range of public and private bodies, including doctors, dentists, opticians, libraries, contraceptive clinics, schools and nurseries. Their staff were advised not to see her alone. The 43-year-old former care worker was forced to withdraw an application to become a foster parent and, eventually, to leave the town where she had lived for ten years. [http://www.gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/212-2/]

  • U.S. government’s terrorist watch list: I would confidently bet that the vast majority of Americans targeted by organized stalking would be unlikely to suspect that their personal circumstances might be connected – even remotely – to the subject of terrorism. Still, it is highly plausible that in many cases such a connection exists within the vast homeland security bureaucracy. The U.S. government’s Terrorist Screening Database is shrouded in secrecy. The fact that names are routinely added and removed from the watch-list – which is officially known as the “Terrorist Screening Database” – combined with the secrecy which surrounds the list, make it difficult to know how many people it includes, but apparently the list has grown rapidly. An article in the New York Times in December 2013 reported that at least 700,000 people were on the watch-list, but an Associated Press report in July 2014 stated that official numbers revealed in a lawsuit showed that “more than 1.5 million [names were] added in the last five years.” Some excerpts from the New York Times article: …the government refuses to confirm or deny whether someone is on the list, officially called the Terrorist Screening Database, or divulge the criteria used to make the decisions… The Terrorist Screening Center, which administers the main terrorist watch list, declined to discuss its procedures, or to release current data about the number of people on various watch lists, and how many of them are American citizens. A report released by the ACLU in March 2014 (pdf file linked below) about the terrorist watch list included a number of references which would resonate with anyone familiar with gang stalking. The report described a system which “blacklists” people “including American citizens” – “based on secret standards and evidence, without a meaningful process to challenge error and clear their names.” This is how the ACLU describes their understanding of how people get placed on the feds’ watchlists: “We don’t know.” The ACLU explained that the U.S. government “has refused to disclose the standards by which it places individuals on other watchlists, such as the No Fly list.” Among the “devastating consequences” of the secret watchlist system cited in the report is the following: “being placed on a U.S. government watchlist can….ruin employment prospects, and isolate an individual from friends and associates.” Here is the ACLU’s recommendation: “Ultimately, Congress and the Obama administration must rein in what the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has called ‘a vast, multi-agency, counterterrorism bureaucracy that tracks hundreds of thousands of individuals’ – a bureaucracy that remains secret and unaccountable to the public or the individuals it targets for blacklisting.” [http://www.gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/212-2/]

  • c) Isolation of said target. This is done via reports. The flagging is meant to warn the community, but they act as little more than slander campaigns. They present a one sided assessment of the targets behavior and activity. The target is never allowed to tell their side of the story or to clear their name. This one sided assessment can include false reports, lies, and legitimate incidents where the target was set up. Eg. People in the targets community are told that the target is crazy, dangerous, a thief, into drugs, a prostitute, pedophile, in trouble for something, needs to be watched. This very flagging in and of itself is capable of creating paranoia, and false interpretation of everyday incidents. Files will even be produced on the target. It’s been shown that community notifications of any kind can and do create a sense of paranoia within a community. [http://www.gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/212-2/]

Colonialism can not exist when, the members of the colonized Nations' natural leaderships' enjoy the legitimate benefits of their own network of support.

Therefore, through the past many centuries, various effective and illegitimate methods of excluding the political dissidents from the public space, have been developed by the colonialists.

Besides the negative influence over my, located in Greece, personal network of support, which, the colonialists have already accomplished and my displacement beyond my fatherland's National borders, during the past seven years I have been, systematically, harassed during my presence in the public space (public libraries, universities, etc), in various countries.

During those harassments I made some recurring observations which may constitute certain characteristic patterns of such kind of harassment:

  • Some of the perpetrators seemed like being narcotics addicts (nervous glance, highly alerted, very thin body, some signs of eccentricity, etc.)

  • Some of the perpetrators seemed like being heavy psychiatric medication addicts (shallow glance, heavy body weight, diabetes, some signs of eccentricity, etc.).

  • Physiognomies of Middle East.

  • Physiognomies of Roma.

  • Most of the times, women.

  • While being concentrated in doing some mental work, the perpetrator attempts to either, fabricate some false evidence of a fake acquaintance with the “targeted individual” in order to abuse this false evidence while fabricating a later, false accusation, or, to fabricate some false evidence (e.g. video recording) in order to adulterate this recording and abuse the outcome for fabricating false negative concerns about the “targeted individual's” mental health.

  • While being concentrated in doing some mental work, the perpetrator attempts to attract the “targeted individual's” attention towards one direction in order for the contributor's associates to perpetuate something illegitimate, at the counter direction.

The colonialists, which, as an historical fact, embed “Mad Dogs” and “Ritchie Boys” mentality and very long colonial traditions, they control the NATO; and the NATO controls some of its member States', Security Authorities and Armed Forces.

The Security Authorities and the Armed Forces, in some countries, are “fishing”, namely, they are involuntarily enlisting, illegitimate contributors, from the minorities of, the drug-addicts, the victims of “psychiatric” oppression, from the immigrants, from the prostitutes, from the child-pornography industry, from the people with disabilities, from the people with chronicle diseases, from the social margin, etc. Then, they force those, involuntary, contributors to illegitimately frame the “targeted” by the colonialists, legitimate and innocent, individuals.





Therefore, I would suggest, to any (isolated) legitimate political dissidents, everywhere:

  • Never answer to a stranger who tries to open a conversation with you. Never.

  • Always watch who is walking close to you towards the same direction and walk away at once if someone you see rises rational suspicions to you.

  • Never exit or enter a building, or, a room, in close proximity with any, unknown to you, person.

  • Preemptively, avoid the “honey traps”. A female contributor is able to make the most extreme false accusations against you even if you even, just let her walk close to you, at the “wrong” public place and at the “wrong” time.

  • Always walk away, at once, if rational suspicions rise by the existence of any person who you have seen coming and staying to a close distance from where you are.

  • Keep written and detailed records for each and every incident that has risen any kind of suspicions to you. Accompany those records with evidence like, photos, video recordings, cash receipts, tickets, official documents, etc.

  • Promptly investigate (the Internet includes excess information about this subject) which is the U2RIT's network of perpetrating social foundations and preemptively undertake all possible, legitimate defenses against, those social foundations', probable, illegitimate actions.

We are, almost certainly, witnessing the return of the neo-Bolsheviks' “Avatars”.

And to a certain extent, unavoidably and sadly, we remain exposed to the, existing and present, threat which their existence, manifests.


Christos Boumpoulis



Bed.png/revision/latest?cb=20101011034745, and here http://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/film/3dmovies/avatarAEM-xlarge.jpg.
Note: The photos were found here https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/jamescameronsavatar/images/7/7e/Avatar_Control_Bed.png/revision/latest?cb=20101011034745, and here http://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/film/3dmovies/avatarAEM-xlarge.jpg.



Τελευταία Ενημέρωση στις Σάββατο, 09 Δεκέμβριος 2017 23:17