Αγορά Πολιτών

Τρόπος Συμμετοχής

Χορηγίες

Πολίτες στην Αγορά

Έχουμε 535 επισκέπτες συνδεδεμένους

Επικοινωνία

Γερμανία 004917667046073 (SMS)

7/3/2017, 20:00

European Dissidents ALARM

 

Zeppelin: Beyond Gravity

 

Foreign intervention in Greece?

 

Η ανελεύθερη Ελλάδα

 

Η Ελλάδα καταγώγιο;

 

Αν.Επ. Π. Παυλόπουλο

  

Intangible prisons

 

Plausible deniability

 

Images of German w & s

 

Crimes against Humanity

 

"Chimera" - "Bellerophon"

 

pr. Donald Trump

 

  

Legal Notice 87

 

Βδέλλες, αποικιοκρατικές

 

Being a German

 

Legal Notice 84

 

Dirty colonial methods

 

Georgi Markov, BG - KGB

 

Samples of Barbarity

 

Ελλάδα - αποκόλληση

 

Έλληνες, στο έλεος...

 

Harvester's log 16/3/17

 

 

Legal Notice 66

 

Execrable

 

Legal Notice 62

 

  

My story

 

  

Aggression?

 

  

Η Εστία μου

 

  

Why so untidy?

 

  

Αποικιοκρατία

 

  

Εξόντωση Ελλήνων αντιφρονούντων;

 

  

Ζήτημα εμπιστοσύνης

 

  

Μεθοδικότητα

 

  

Ανοικτή Επιστολή πρέσβη ΗΠΑ

Αφορμή, U2RIT vs Ελλάδα;

Βιοηθική

A request to U2RIT

Colonial aggression - 2

Open Letter to UN S.G.

Open Letter to p.C. & p. O.

Δήλωση πρόθεσης επαναπατρισμού

 

Ο "εφιάλτης" της Νυρεμβέργης

Συλλογή Φωτογραφιών

Αίτημα προστασίας, προς Ιταλία

Chroma key, background removal

Science and Ethics

Να συμβάλει και η U2RIT

Θα ξαναφτιάξουν πολλές φορές Άουσβιτς και Zyclon B

 

Split-Screen effect

Η Ζωή είναι Ωραία.

Βόρεια Κορέα

Λευτεριά στους Έλληνες, εξανα- γκαστικά "Εξαφανισμένους"

 

Μυστικές δίκες;

Trustworthiness

Πολιτισμό, ή, απληστία;

Ακραία Στυγνότητα

Η Τέχνη της Επιβίωσης

Political Asylum 3

Επιστροφή στις ρίζες

The Human Cost of Torture

An urgent appeal for solidarity

More obvious than the Sun

Western "culture"

Political Asylum

Έννομη Προστασία

Μια μήνυση που εγείρει ερωτηματικά

 

 

 

Honor your father...

Noise

Creative Greeks

A pair of Dictatorships

Βασικές γνώσεις: Μαθήματα 1ον και 2ον PDF Εκτύπωση E-mail
Αξιολόγηση Χρήστη: / 0
ΧείριστοΆριστο 
Συνεννόηση για Δράση - Απόψεις
Συντάχθηκε απο τον/την Χρήστος Μπούμπουλης (Christos Boumpoulis)   
Παρασκευή, 26 Μάιος 2017 21:38
Βασικές γνώσεις: Μαθήματα 1ον και 2ον
Μάθημα 1ον - Ελληνικό αλφάβητο
Το ελληνικό αλφάβητο είναι το αλφαβητικό σύστημα γραφής που χρησιμοποιείται για τη γραφή της ελληνικής γλώσσας, από τον 8ο αιώνα π.Χ.[2] Προέρχεται από το φοινικικό αλφάβητο και με τη σειρά του έγινε ο πρόγονος πολυάριθμων συστημάτων γραφής της Ευρώπης και της Μέσης Ανατολής, συμπεριλαμβανόμενης της λατινικής και της κυριλλικής γραφής. Επιπλέον, χρησιμοποιείται ως πηγή τεχνικών συμβόλων για χρήση σε διάφορες επιστήμες.
Στην κλασική και σύγχρονη μορφή του, το ελληνικό αλφάβητο διαθέτει 24 γράμματα, ταξινομημένα από το άλφα ως το ωμέγα. Όπως το λατινικό και κυριλλικό αλφάβητο, είχε αρχικά μόνο έναν τύπο για κάθε γράμμα. Η διάκριση κεφαλαίων από μικρά γράμματα αναπτύχθηκε κατά τη νεότερη εποχή, κατ' αναλογία με το λατινικό αλφάβητο.
Οι ηχητικές αξίες και οι συμβατικές μεταγραφές ορισμένων γραμμάτων στη Νέα Ελληνική διαφέρουν από εκείνες της Αρχαίας Ελληνικής, λόγω των ενδιάμεσων φωνολογικών αλλαγών.
Στην παραδοσιακή πολυτονική ορθογραφία, τα γράμματα των φωνηέντων μπορεί να συνδυάζονται με διάφορα διακριτικά σημεία, όπως τόνους, πνεύματα, την κορωνίδα και την υπογεγραμμένη. Από τη δεκαετία του 1980, και για όλες τις συνήθεις εφαρμογές, αυτό το σύστημα έχει απλοποιηθεί στο λεγόμενο μονοτονικό.
[https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ελληνικό_αλφάβητο]
 
ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΟ ΑΛΦΑΒΗΤΟ
 

cbradio.jpg

www.agorapoliton.gr/images/stories/cbradio.jpg
 

pmr-radio.jpg

www.agorapoliton.gr/images/stories/pmr-radio.jpg
 
Μάθημα 2ον – Ομαδική δράση και ενδοεπικοινωνία
Understanding the How-To of Effective Communication in Small Groups
Even though a group dynamic is always different, UA researcher Joseph Bonito said: “We can learn a lot of valuable information about what happens when people get together and talk through problems in order to make a decision.”
It is likely a daily occurrence: People hold well-intentioned meetings that ultimately turn out to be ineffective.
Why? The list of variables can be astonishingly long, said Joseph Bonito, a University of Arizona communication professor who specializes in small group communication.
A clash in personality types can result in failed meetings just as a differentiation of rank can result in lower engagement. Likewise, the failure to communicate expectations during and after the meeting can be problematic.
Despite such a striking range of variables, because meetings purportedly exist in certain settings to engage interaction and important decision-making processes, Bonito's research agenda advances what is known about effective and ineffective group-based communication and successful decision making processes.
"How we communicate, how we discuss is essential," said Bonito, who specifically studies the communication patterns that lead to effective decision making.
Bonito is currently engaged in two investigations of group communication, one involving staff members in smoking cessation programs; the other studying individuals involved in Lego building competitions.
"Part of what happens when we have group discussion is somewhat predictable and formulaic, but a lot of it is also unpredictable and dynamic," he said. "The question is how those two parts are put together by people in groups to come up with an outcome that is reasonable and acceptable to all."
In one study, Bonito serves as the co-investigator with other researchers at The University of Arizona Cancer Center on a National Institutes of Health and National Cancer Institute grant. The team is examining the North American Quitline Consortium, a network of publicly funded smoking cessation providers in the U.S. and Canada.
Research findings on the quitlines has already been peer-reviewed and published in an April issue of Health Communication.
Bonito was lead author on the co-authored paper, "Assessing the Preconditions for Communication Influence on Decision Making: The North American Quitline Consortium," with researchers from the State University of New York at Brockport, the North American Quitline Consortium, or NAQC, and the UA Cancer Center.
All 50 states in the U.S. have quitlines, which were mandated by a court settlement after tobacco companies were sued for misleadingly marketing their product, contributing to nicotine addiction.
The quitlines provide services to smokers who want to discontinue their smoking habit. Smokers call to speak to a quitline representative, who makes available a variety of services, such as counseling, a nicotine patch, or a "text to quit" service that provides smokers with a daily message on the benefits of living a smoking-free life.
For the investigation, Bonito and his team targeted 269 participants, all affiliated with the NAQC, and evaluated how the information regarding smoking cessation services was being shared. For example, quitlines have conferences, bulletin boards and blogs where service providers post information about a service that they believe to be successful in helping smokers quit.
"Communication patterns in groups tend to rely on a variety of factors," said Jennifer Ervin, a UA communication graduate student and Bonito's research assistant. "These factors include: What is the ultimate goal of the group? Does a consensus need to be made? Is there a clear solution or is it more subjective? Is equal participation required?"
In order to answer these questions, Bonito and his colleagues embarked on a network analysis that included sending quitlines a survey for three consecutive years.
Among other things, the team found that perceived organizational values and attitudes greatly influenced decisions around adopt cessation practices. Also influential were mandates and budgeting considerations. But the team found that those "internal constraints," such as values and attitudes internal to an organization, were important contributors to the adoption of quitlines.
Ultimately, the team's findings indicated that consensus was crucial in determining the adoption of quitlines; that assigning an individual decision-maker was less effective. The finding is somewhat counter to the belief that there must exist a single, leading voice to enact change.
In an unrelated but thematically similar project, Bonito is leading an investigation of communication among Lego League building teams.
Bonito and his collaborators are studying the decision-making processes of local Lego robotics teams, a project inspired by his four-year stint as the coach of his son's team.
The main goal of the Lego robotics teams is to teach children how to work together and the importance of teamwork, Ervin noted.
"It's really exciting to see these children evolve and learn to work together," she said.
Each group is given sets of instructions for how to build and program their robot to perform certain tasks. Groups then compete at regional, state and national competitions where robot performance and design are judged, as are teamwork skills, which include clarity of team goals, balanced involvement and time management.
Bonito and his team are investigating how team members set certain group-based values, work together and manage the communication process. The team videotapes the children as they work in groups to assemble a Lego robot. The researchers also will gauge team success, based on the evaluation of judges, to determine which communication practices contribute to performance for those who place well in the competition versus those who do not.
"I am fully convinced that children learn about teamwork from, among other things, how their families handle decision making on issues large and small," Bonito said. "This gives us a chance to see how children learn about and practice team work."
In fact, the next phase of Bonito's work on the developmental teamwork processes of children includes asking parents to explain how they taught their kids about teamwork.
Coupled with the investigation of smoking cessation teams, Bonito hopes the Lego team investigation will eventually enhance what is known about effective group-based communication.
"If it were so easy to predict group outcomes from the types of people chosen to be in a group, what is the point in having a meeting at all? But we expect something to happen in meetings – that's what group discussion is all about," Bonito said.
"We assume that group decision making is superior to how individuals decide, but that doesn't happen by magic," he said. "There is something about that process that leads me to believe that communication scholars can have some bearing on understanding why. By being able to understand things, we can tell people how to be better at what they do."
 
Μια μικρή, ή, μεγάλη ομάδα προσώπων (π.χ. ένα ολόκληρο Έθνος), εξ ορισμού (εφόσον είναι, όντως, ομάδα), απολαμβάνει την ελευθερία (δηλαδή, άφοβα) της επικοινωνίας μεταξύ των μελών της, διαφορετικά, δεν είναι ομάδα, αλλά, μια σύναξη μεμονωμένων προσώπων.
Μια ομάδα προσώπων μπορεί, να θέτει κοινούς, προς επίτευξη στόχους και στη συνέχεια, σε μεγάλο, ή, μικρό, βαθμό να επιτυγχάνει αυτούς τους στόχους. Ενώ, μια σύναξη μεμονωμένων προσώπων, δεν μπορεί.
Σε βάρος μιας ομάδας προσώπων, η οποία απολαμβάνει το αγαθό της ανοικτής (ενδο-) επικοινωνίας, είναι, σχεδόν, αδύνατο να εφαρμοστεί η τακτική του “διαίρει και βασίλευε”. Ενώ, μια σύναξη μεμονωμένων προσώπων αποτελεί ένα, σχεδόν, ιδανικό (από μη ηθικής, αισχροκερδούς άποψης) υποκείμενο για εφαρμογή, σε βάρος του, αυτής της τακτικής.
Στην υποβάθμιση, είτε, εξάλειψη, της επικοινωνίας εντός μιας ομάδας προσώπων, δυνητικά, συμβάλλει η καλλιέργεια, εντός της ομάδας, ενός γενικευμένου αισθήματος, φόβου, είτε, καχυποψίας.
Στην αναβάθμιση της αποτελεσματικότητας δράσης, μιας ομάδας προσώπων, συμβάλλει, αρχικά, η έγκαιρη αντιμετώπιση των δυνητικών αιτίων, φόβου, είτε, καχυποψίας και στη συνέχεια, η εγκαθίδρυση (μη διαμεσολαβούμενων) διαύλων ελεύθερης (και ασφαλούς) επικοινωνίας μεταξύ των μελών της ομάδας.
 
Χρήστος Μπούμπουλης
οικονομολόγος
 
Σημείωση: οι φωτογραφίες βρέθηκαν, εδώ http://cb27.ro/img/p/38-63-thickbox.jpg και εδώ https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/PMR_radio.jpg.
Παράρτημα
Surviving Captivity, Banding Together to Work as a Team to Escape
If your captors know anything about keeping you helpless, they will segregate you, isolate you and not give captives a chance to help each other. However it is unlikely that captors in most of the SHTF scenarios described below (keep reading) would know the advantage they would get by doing this, or have the resources to separate everyone.
The best possible scenario would be to have the people you know and trust close by and then be able to communicate with them.
This might be possible in a FEMA or government-run camp, and you should use it to your maximum advantage along with the motivation to escape earlier rather than later. Having people you know you can trust is a huge motivation factor and helps with the attitude of survival as well.

 

 

Τελευταία Ενημέρωση στις Παρασκευή, 26 Μάιος 2017 21:55